FORUMS_

EHere's my take on it.

Maps: I can honestly say this has the worst maps of the series, even worse then mw3, which is quite a feat.

Spawns:  Holy crap, their awful.

Ghost: Im not a fan of this whole competitive gaming crap(MLG are THE worst of all complainer). Look, I want Ghost to go back to normal, complete UAV denial, not this half assed bullshit.

SMG's: I have, and always will be an LMG user. I'm sick of seeing some fool down me across a good distance when we both have a bead on one another.  He should be a stain on the wall, but nope, I always end up dying.

so far i think BO2 is slightly below MW2, which i consider the best cod, might be because i havent played COD4 but still. MW2's only major issue: perk balance. everything else like QS was a issue but not as big.

to reduce lag, avoid crowded servers, try to get into half empty servers. those games tend ot have teh least lag, i starting to wonder if activision/3arch servers are causing extra lag by being a middle man. instead of a direct host connection. whose only lagcomp nessasary is a less than.1 second delay to confirm the other guy didnt really kill you. everything over .1 seconds of lag is purly from softwaire,routers,servers ect. MW2 had people with overall slightly worse than now. so most likly cuase is server quality.

spawnign needs improvement, that is what i hope they are working on in teh next patch, which is taking a while =/.

map balance is ehh. they did to much CQC, but they did allow atleast 1 of each main kind of level that preffers something else. but they did take some levels taht wernt constant CQC out fo rotation, some non CQC maps seem to show up less often than just odds would let them. no map unless its litterly to small to play on should be taken out of rotation. add in maps with more veriety of playstiles. dont have more than 2 CQC maps in the DLC becaue we already have too much of those.

weapon balance prefers SMG's and shottguns(SMG counters) because of map design =/. LMG's need a damadge buff compared to AR's SMG's need a accressy nerf. if the guy is usualy really close to you then y would you need good accressy? laser sight should give normal SMG hipfire accressy.

LMG's need the extra firepower, only beat my SMG's at very close range. AR's need to be teh slowest killing machine guns, but well they are all purpose, they can also take any class on if used right, only problem is map design makes it hard to counter SMG's with AR's. snipers are fine this time around.

I like this game as well.  It was the overhaul Cod needed.  Alot of people say Cod 4 was the best one ever made.  Have you actually played it recently?  It isnt.  Its just as laggy as this game, just as many connection interuptions(which is usually a boot from the match in 4).  But with worse graphics and alot less options.  I find the comparison quite funny actually.

I actually liked CoD2 the best but that was before most these players times! Lol

CoD4 was great but remember, it was the first one to leave the WW2 theme behind so there was nothing to compare it to but maybe counter strike which I never got into on PC. The console version was just horrific IMO. So really, in the "Modern Warfare" sense, BO2 is a step ahead for sure. I just would like an even playing field with connections and spawns. I don't care about nerfing weapons. Let the SMG's be strong because the kiddies seem to think they can just run around anywhere which is gross over confidence when I'm hold up with my AN94 in my perch!

Well, I don't know. I 'm not a "Black helicopter in sky" person. The game is new and it is a good game. I just want the new patch for PS3 to get the matchmaking functioning in an acceptable manner.

I thought moderators are the only ones who can delete posts????