Skip navigation

FORUMS_

1169 Views     11 Replies
1169 Views 10 Replies Latest reply: Jan 28, 2013 6:48 PM by LLAMALOMAS RSS
EndGrave Newbie 12 posts since
Nov 14, 2011

Why Not More Guns? How About More Guns via the DLC?

Posted by EndGrave on Nov 26, 2012 11:28 PM

Hi Guys,

 

so every one of these games and i keep asking myself the same question, why dont we have more guns? and why only 4 shotguns? hell even modern warfare had more and that game wasnt the best out there for sure.

 

Why not have more guns added to the game with each DLC? I understnad balacing needs to be done, but whats the issue thats why you have engineers and devs making 250K-300K a year, just do it yea?

 

Other games do it? looks at mass effect, the release new guns with their DLC? whats the point of just new maps with no new toys to play with? My point here is, this is a SHOOTER, this being said, we should have lots of options to shoot with, not just a limited amount of guns. You also pushed this thing intot he "future" well open up the reigns a bit give more options for guns, especially the assult rifles, they really suffered this year, even I who am an avid assault rifle user had to put em down for an SMG, which is kind of unreal.

 

Love the game but these sublties that help.

 

anyone else seeing the same things with lack of primary guns?

1169 Views     
  • dtuchpunk Master 5,157 posts since
    Jun 9, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated

    They can't balance the guns that are allready in the game.
    Putting in more guns will give more OP and UP guns

    And the game is out of memory can't have more guns.

    • LLAMALOMAS Calculating status... 16 posts since
      Sep 5, 2012
      Currently Being Moderated

      hey i just read that reply and this is crazy but the game has dlc to add more guns maybe

  • trialstardragon Master 10,400 posts since
    May 26, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated

    There is no need to have more than what we have right now. This game does not need a dozen of every kind of gun in the game. Because even if it did barely 1% would be used anyways. People will still grativate and only use what they like the most. So the extra guns would be a waste of space.

    • SRThunder Newbie 54 posts since
      Nov 14, 2012
      Currently Being Moderated

      trialstardragon wrote:

       

      There is no need to have more than what we have right now. This game does not need a dozen of every kind of gun in the game. Because even if it did barely 1% would be used anyways. People will still grativate and only use what they like the most. So the extra guns would be a waste of space.

       

  • parnezzi Apprentice 1,006 posts since
    Aug 5, 2012
    Currently Being Moderated

    it needs something else because 4 more most likely clusterfucked maps and some crappy zombie maps with lava everywhere is kind of a rip off.

    hell Bf3 does it just fine and they have more than just 4 maps and 1 new probably reskined scorpion SMG

  • gross1985 Master 3,143 posts since
    May 24, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated

    I don't see what place the Peacekeeper SMG would have in Campaign, so I'm inclined to agree with those who think that it will be implemented in Zombies. :/

     

    I'm always open to having a new gun in Campaign and MP, though.....but, I'm just being realistic here.

  • xB0NEZx Newbie 5 posts since
    Jan 28, 2013
    Currently Being Moderated

    Future gun dlc suggestion: A revolver, just plain old revolver no shotgun shells, just a futuristic revolver, A was a big fan of the python in BO1. If they do they should call it the Reaper.

Bookmarked By (0)

Legend

  • Correct Answers - 4 points
  • Helpful Answers - 3 points