Tell that to beastblood. Just because we don't get the chance to spend $$ on more sh*tty maps doesn't mean the game's going to suck. Plus, Nintendo would NEVER SHOOT THEMSELVES IN THE FOOT LIKE THAT. I'm now beggining to think the Activision/Nintendo feud is just....stupid. It doesn't make any sense, multimillion dollar companies we're talking about here, getting butt hurt about a few hundred repairs that will mass up to a few thousand dollars(There's people out there that spend 12k on a CAR WASH. No, not a car wash as in a machine.....an actual car wash. By some guy named Paul...I don't know where I was going with this.)......WHAT THE PASTRIES. I think the reason why DLC wasn't released on the Wii was strictly because Activision....well I have a list:
1)The game didn't sell as much as Activision hoped.
2)You only start to get money after selling 6k copies.
3)Nobody really buys map packs anyways.
4)Piracy on the wii is almost encouraged.
SO WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT IT ITS ALL THE HAXORS FAULTS.
I was going to say something else but I forgot. OH right....Nuketown was fun on BO because BO had more of a variety of maps. Nuketown/Firing range and Havana were pretty much the only fast paced maps. That's why they were fun. The less there is the more we appreciate them. But I heard BO2 has a lot of small maps....in fact....I heard they beat MW3 in small map..ness.