Skip navigation
Up to Discussions in PC

FORUMS_

3137 Views     15 Replies
3137 Views 14 Replies Latest reply: Nov 14, 2012 8:34 AM by xDropdead RSS
wierd worlds are these Expert 1,972 posts since
Oct 21, 2011

Graphics???

Posted by wierd worlds are these on Nov 13, 2012 9:19 AM

Anyone else disappointed with the "DX11" graphics???

 

To me it looks like a DX9 game!!!!

 

Ran it on the max settings and it just doesn't appear any better looking than MW2, MW3 and Black OP's 1 and they are all DX9 games.

 

 

It looks better than the new Medal Of Honor game but it still doesn't look as good as Crysis 1 lol a game that iirc is around 7 or 8 years old(?)

 

I know it's a console port but I would have thought adding DX11 to the game would have given us better graphics than we got.

 

I am disappointed with Treyarch after all they spouted on to pc gamers how the game was going to look so much better than any Call Of Duty game before but to me it just doesn't.

3137 Views     
  • milkyTA Novice 163 posts since
    Nov 2, 2012
    Currently Being Moderated
    milkyTA     Nov 13, 2012 10:17 AM (in response to wierd worlds are these)

    True def not as good as I thought it would be graphically. Also doesnt seem to support SLI which they said it would

  • ChasmSX Calculating status... 2 posts since
    Nov 13, 2012
    Currently Being Moderated
    ChasmSX     Nov 13, 2012 11:07 AM (in response to wierd worlds are these)

    I'm also disappointed closed the game in the first mission these graphics just suck. Normally I'm not the type who needs these advanced graphics but especially in games like this they are a big part of the atmosphere. With these graphics and these performance issues I will not play this game which is really sad I always liked the Cod storys but black ops 2 just sucks never before stopped playing a game in the first few minutes.

     

    I'm really sad I was so happy when it finally did come out, but at least I can play Hitman in a week.

  • Guny6 Newbie 4 posts since
    Nov 13, 2012
    Currently Being Moderated
    Guny6     Nov 13, 2012 12:13 PM (in response to wierd worlds are these)

    That bad?

  • KickAssDave Newbie 22 posts since
    Nov 13, 2012
    Currently Being Moderated
    KickAssDave     Nov 13, 2012 3:59 PM (in response to wierd worlds are these)

    I registered JUST so I could post in here and agree with you.

     

    One of the most immensely disappointing games I've ever played.  The graphics are pathetic when you compare it to other games... just look at Battlefield 3.. this came out in November 2011 and still looks far far far superior in every respect. 

     

    Saying they wanted this game to appear at a smooth framerate is an awful excuse for sheer lazy development.  The game engine has barely changed in 7 years and I actually gave them the benefit of doubt when I purchased it. 

     

    £39.99 for an underdeveloped, lazy port which, in my opinion, could have been a patch nevermind a new game is just robbery.

     

    The COD series is now well and truly separated itself from the PC gaming community.  This game is embarrassing compared to others.  The fact, as you mentioned, you have games like Crysis 1 and BF3 looking much better despite the age difference is ridiculous.

     

    So so disappointed....

     

    p.s. I also closed the game shortly after the first mission because I was so annoyed at the same old game engine/graphics and gameplay

     

    I'm now patiently waiting for Battlefield 4.  At least EA make an effort.

  • Biggy13 Newbie 54 posts since
    Nov 6, 2012
    Currently Being Moderated
    Biggy13     Nov 13, 2012 4:03 PM (in response to wierd worlds are these)

    You have to remember that it's still a console port. Any dx11 effects are added in after. It's not a true dx11 game. I think you were expecting a little to much from a port.

    • KickAssDave Newbie 22 posts since
      Nov 13, 2012
      Currently Being Moderated
      KickAssDave     Nov 14, 2012 6:03 AM (in response to Biggy13)

      This game started out on PC!  There is simply no excuse for releasing a game with this kind of attention it gets and the money they have, and having made a half arsed attempt on the graphics.

       

      They haven't updated the graphics engine, not because it's smooth on consoles and they don't want to change that, but because that costs money, and they might have to then actually putting some high-res textures in their very similar collection of games.

       

      I was standing close to a wall in the game and couldn't believe I was seeing these big splodgy looking low res textures... in a game released in 2012.

       

      Just dire...

  • AlbusDlx Calculating status... 4 posts since
    Nov 14, 2012
    Currently Being Moderated
    AlbusDlx     Nov 14, 2012 6:07 AM (in response to wierd worlds are these)

    Looks better than the new Medal of Honor??? Are you blind or what? That game is stunning, a true DX11 game rand by the frostbite engine. It even tops BF3 in apperance. The game it self is way worse then black ops 2 though.

     

    Can anyone here confirm or deny that the max res setting on black ops 2 is 1600x900?? Because my  game wont go any higher and this is a true scandal if this is a planned move or something to get it to run smooth on consoll, they have no more milk, make new consolls! =D

    • webbygregg Newbie 23 posts since
      Nov 13, 2012
      Currently Being Moderated
      webbygregg     Nov 14, 2012 6:36 AM (in response to AlbusDlx)

      Yeah the single player MOHW has beautiful graphics, the multiplayer not so much but still better then blops2.

       

      BTW the resolution thing seems to be a thing with playing on TV's rather than monitors, is that what your doing?

       

      1920x1080 works fine on my s27a950 monitor.

      • AlbusDlx Newbie 4 posts since
        Nov 14, 2012
        Currently Being Moderated
        AlbusDlx     Nov 14, 2012 7:18 AM (in response to webbygregg)

        yeah, i play with 42" LG LCD TV, Ok, so I should be mentioning this to AMD, drivers for my graphics. Any one got stuck on the horse? Loosing control completly in the end of the first ride.

        • Modek Newbie 18 posts since
          Nov 13, 2012
          Currently Being Moderated
          Modek     Nov 14, 2012 7:28 AM (in response to AlbusDlx)

          i play on a television also but i use vga connection instead of hdmi and it allows me to goto 1080

      • xDropdead Calculating status... 1 posts since
        Nov 14, 2012
        Currently Being Moderated
        xDropdead     Nov 14, 2012 8:34 AM (in response to webbygregg)

        I play on a 24" 1080p monitor and every game runs fine 1920x1080 on it but for me the max on BO2 is 1680x1050. There is no option above 1680x1050 for some reason:S Any one knows how to fix this? I have alrdy updated my AMD driver

    • ChasmSX Newbie 2 posts since
      Nov 13, 2012
      Currently Being Moderated
      ChasmSX     Nov 14, 2012 8:13 AM (in response to AlbusDlx)

      You are playing the game on 1600x900 and want to tell me something about good graphics?

      You sir must be the blind one. Maybe it looks good on the console maybe you played the console version i cant imagine how else you could say it looks better than bf3 and mohw. but i guess i should not give a f*** about what you are saying just take a look at the forums we are not the only ones who are thinking this game is a joke

       

      Just for you http://www.imagebanana.com/view/gzpi3lzk/shot0000.jpg

      maxed settings

       

      http://www.imagebanana.com/view/pbmino8f/ScreenshotWin320001.png

      maxed settings

Bookmarked By (1)