FORUMS_

No.

First of all, YouTubers take note. THIS is how you post to this forum. You bring up a topic, embed the video into the thread, and ask for discussion. Your video is not about subbing or liking or the open lobby you are having next week, its about a specific topic, has interesting thoughts and ideas and promotes discussion. Good job on the vid Capp, I would just say the intro was a little awkward. You had  cool graphic, then music over the gameplay. I almost turned it off at that point, but once you began your commentary it was interesting and engaging. It was good to see real gameplay, too, not something that makes you look superbeast but every bit the everyday gamer as you have tagged yourself(this to me is a good thing, its more entertaining to watch), good work sir.

As for the topic, I am not at all in favor of Stacking Killstreaks. I hated, hated, HATED how people let the killstreaks do all the work in MW2. How is that accomplishing anything? I always felt accomplished and that I truly earned my streaks when I got them in BlOps <I am not a high killstreak guy, I run a lot>. True that some people camp to earn them, but BlOps did a good job with map design not allowing the campers to feel too safe. There was always a way to get to them. It encouraged teamwork, too. Know that your teammate is near dogs? Protect him and make sure he gets that streak to help your team towards the objective. In fact, I think Black Ops pretty much got the Kill Streaks right. They were powerful but never felt too OP to me.

Personally, I like the way it was done in MW3.

Assault = Chain.

Support = No chain.

I hope Treyarch follows this route with Black Ops II.

I don't want to come across as a douche here, but I'd wager that most people wanting non-chaining killstreaks are more often than not, the ones on the receiving end of air support. Don't know about you guys, but when I call in a Predator Missile, get two kills and get my Attack Helicopter, I don't complain.

I say no all chaining streaks have done im my experiance is cause players to camp either they don't want to move so they can get more kills from the streaks they have or they are unable to move because there is to much air support, it also directly influences the ammount of stealth perk players in a game IE more air support = more ghosts ect. and finaly and IMO most importantly players should NEVER be rewarded for doing nothing a player should be forced to go out and use the skills they have learned to get the "nice things" to play with instead of sitting around and letting the AI do it for them.

No. Chaning killstreaks require no skills if it wasnt for that i wouldnt be able to get osprey gunners. Unchainable killstreaks takes skills. Every game you play in bo you didnt always see dogs.

How bout no kill streaks at all. I'm sick of them. Sick of freebee kills. Though, I did have fun with the RC-XD. I loved having it hump someone on the other team's leg before blowing up. But I'm sick of dying from unmaned aircrafts.

A word of advice about the video.

1. Speak louder and lower the game/music volume it's really hard to hear your voice.

2. Get to the point of the video, if you have a subject to talk about. Pretty much everyone who watches them has either played it or have watched enough videos to figure out what gun and perks you use.

Don't take it wrong just friendly advice other than that good video.

Now to the subject of killstreak chaining. My idea of it is this. If support comes back let those killstreaks chain but reset on death. If they are none violent killstreaks then i don't see a problem with having a SAM turret get you enough points to bring you to your next pointstreak.

As for assult HELL no. Usually these killstreaks are powerful and i've always thought it was a complete joke to let powerful killstreaks earn you MORE powerful killstreaks. I love the blackops set up. The killstreaks themselves are satisfying and if left uncontested can really change a game, yet if the enemy is smart your killstreaks will gain you nothing. When it comes to that time when you go on a rampage and earn your high killstreaks, it's statisfying. Take MW2 and 3 for example. Getting choppergunner on there really didn't feel like that much. Pretty much you just had to earn 5 kills and then you are set.

i feel your killstreaks should not count towards your next, also the only reason there are more campers in black ops is that all most of the rush players have moved to mw3

no no NO!!!

no chaining.   absolutely hated the fact mw2+mw3 has this.

EARN your killstreaks by gun on gun fighting,  not let some killstreak get you more kills only to get a more lethal kill streak. no skill in that.  

a player could get his first few kills,  get a predator missle then go and hide,  get some more kills with that, get a chopper or air strike for some more kills then get a heavy duty kill streak like ac-130 all by just sitting in a corner doing no work.

in that horrid game mw2,  it was more about sh!t flying around in the air you had to worry about.

mw3..... god i havent touched that abomination in months but still has the same thing, constant crap in the air from some guy hinding in a corner.

no chaining killstreaks.   just isnt really gun on gun fighting when you are constantly looking in the sky hoping that something isnt dropped on your head.

Indifferent.........