Skip navigation

FORUMS_

15987 Views     55 Replies
1 2 3 ... 6 Previous Next 15987 Views 54 Replies Latest reply: May 4, 2012 11:22 AM by a.d.p.alien RSS
banaNOVA Calculating status... 21 posts since
Jan 29, 2012

black ops II graphics suck?

Posted by banaNOVA on May 3, 2012 9:37 AM

so hello. We all know the black ops II graphics suck but why, there must be a reason they have alot of money so that coedn't be the problem.i don't know alot of the technecly stuff but did you ever thought you have like a disc and a game takes memory from that disc so let's see black ops II.. probaly awesome campaign it's treyarch, you have zombies with has diffrent modes and you have an expanded multiplayer and to put something more you have 60fps if not lag. so they could chose black ops graphics and keep all of the stuff or perhaps a new engine with putted the graphics up ofcource call of duty keeps 60fps so need do like remove zombies or something. i'm only trying to tell there must be a REASON! (Bad english i know :-) )

 

 

 

 

-discus

15987 Views     
  • Dozerdown Novice 187 posts since
    Oct 25, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated

    Tbh the graphics aren't that bad compared to the other Call of Duty games. Also, from what i've heard there's going to be 2 discs for Black Ops 2. So i'm sure memory wouldn't really be a problem. I may be wrong though.

  • Newbie 3 posts since
    May 3, 2012
    Currently Being Moderated

    Come on they have 6 months left.They still can improve it.

  • Becon of Death Master 2,084 posts since
    Oct 24, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated

    I know that graphics don't make the game, however I hated the Black Ops 1 graphics. I felt as though I was playing in playdough ville. I just hope the graphics are not as bad as the first Black Ops. Don't get me wrong, Black Ops 1 was a fun game, I just didn't like the multiplayer graphics.

     

    Edit: The campaign graphics always look better then the mp graphics. Even though I havent seen the mp yet, I remember seeing the bo1 campaign graphics and then mp graphics and imo the campaign graphics looked better.

  • CorruptedGamingTV Novice 49 posts since
    Apr 9, 2012
    Currently Being Moderated

    dude,the graphice in the trailer ar cinematics,you havnt even seen in game graphics yet,so id wait to see some gameplay before you can talk about graphics

  • Becon of Death Master 2,084 posts since
    Oct 24, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated

    Well what about Bo1 before the big vietnam fight. When you are riding in the jeeps with woods and the cia guy and the plane crahses. That was a cinematic, but used the same graphics as campaign.

  • Becon of Death Master 2,084 posts since
    Oct 24, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated

    CorruptedGamingTV wrote:

     

    ,you havnt even seen in game graphics yet,so id wait to see some gameplay before you can talk about graphics

     

    its still early in the graphics process yes, which means this is our chance to offer feed back before they make things permenant.

  • Steve2589 Apprentice 1,010 posts since
    Oct 2, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated

    What's wrong with the graphics? Seriously, don't just come out with "it sucks" what do you want to see? To me, the graphics look absolutely fine, good in fact. Besides, gameplay over graphics any day

  • eknud Apprentice 1,023 posts since
    Aug 18, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated

    They look fine to me. I like Treyarch because their colors aren't as dull and foggy as IW's, at least in the last few games (haven't played every game in the series)

  • Apprentice 514 posts since
    Apr 17, 2012
    Currently Being Moderated

    Who cares about the graphics.

     

    I'd rather have gameplay without major frame drops, than amazing graphics that my Xbox can only handle at 15 or 20 FPS.

     

    inb4buyaPC comment

1 2 3 ... 6 Previous Next

Actions

Bookmarked By (0)