FORUMS_

It's not a finished game yet! They have six months to improve the graphics! No game looks that good this far away from the release date.

I remember reading an artical somewhere talking about how they improved on textures and lighting or w/e. Anyways I don't really care as long as the weapons dont look like crap

banaNOVA wrote:

 

so hello. We all know the black ops II graphics suck but why, there must be a reason they have alot of money so that coedn't be the problem.i don't know alot of the technecly stuff but did you ever thought you have like a disc and a game takes memory from that disc so let's see black ops II.. probaly awesome campaign it's treyarch, you have zombies with has diffrent modes and you have an expanded multiplayer and to put something more you have 60fps if not lag. so they could chose black ops graphics and keep all of the stuff or perhaps a new engine with putted the graphics up ofcource call of duty keeps 60fps so need do like remove zombies or something. i'm only trying to tell there must be a REASON! (Bad english i know :-) )

 

 

 

 

-discus

I don't expect a big jump in graphics until the next gen consoles are out.  I've heard rumors, but I'm curious to know when the next gen consoles are really going to arrive.

I'm not part of your "we" group since I believe the graphics look fantastic. It is definitely a step up from Black Ops considering the game will be using DX11, but as others have stated already, the game is still in the early development process. Give it a few more months and wait to see what changes.

Also, there is a huge difference from watching a 720p video on YouTube vs actually putting the disc in to your system of choice and seeing it displayed in a upscaled 1080p. Of course it depends on the TV or monitor, but a majority of people have HDTVs or HD monitors.

- TopFighter

banaNOVA wrote:

 

so hello. We all know the black ops II graphics suck but why, there must be a reason they have alot of money so that coedn't be the problem.i don't know alot of the technecly stuff but did you ever thought you have like a disc and a game takes memory from that disc so let's see black ops II.. probaly awesome campaign it's treyarch, you have zombies with has diffrent modes and you have an expanded multiplayer and to put something more you have 60fps if not lag. so they could chose black ops graphics and keep all of the stuff or perhaps a new engine with putted the graphics up ofcource call of duty keeps 60fps so need do like remove zombies or something. i'm only trying to tell there must be a REASON! (Bad english i know :-) )

 

 

 

 

-discus

That part right there saved you from a tongue lashing

but to cry out the graphics suck is a waste of air. Its basically the same game engine so graphics are not going to change.

GAMEPLAY is what really makes a game overall. Graphics do play a good part in a game but gameplay is a major thing to me.

You have 6 months to decide if you want the game. If you buy it then you have no reason to complain anymore unless you are a part of the majority. Otherwise your veiw on the game means nothing.