I say no to stopping power, I understand if you want to add that perk while decreasing the guns damage without it. This would then give you an edge of people not using this said perk. Instead they decided to up guns damage to a point and leave it out. If they did do this and people ran specialist then they would become op. Better to leave it as-is. This is not the save all for people to move away from assassin. to counter the uav spam.

If people are actually upset about assassin users and the uav spam just move uav to the assault killstreaks at 3. While I say this I also think if using the assualt package they should only grant these with kills not points like shooting down stuff or capturing things.

The support should be the only thing where you gain points towards your streaks, while also moving stealth bomber to assault.

rsjc, sniper rifles are primarily meant to be OHKs. Especially the 50cal. What I still don't get, which is a big middle finger to anyone who says SP was OP.. 50cal + SP + FMJ weren't always OHKs. 50% of the time, it took 2 or 3 shots. A 50cal should be OHK anywhere but the foot. Not hitmarker hitmarker (Both in the chest) and *Escape*.

Juggernaut and Double Tap were the best things to EVER get removed. Without someone being forced to use the counter, they were nearly impossible to overcome. Plus NOTHING was more annoying than Juggernaut + Last Stand.

I loved SP as I love sniping and SP was usually able to give me my OHKs as I deserved when I was LEGITLY sniping. Plus, it limited the annoyance of "QuickScoping" because they either needed SP to get that stupid OHK shotgun style leaving them visable to UAVs.

CoD 4 is still the best online CoD by far as it was extremely balanced compared to the newer releases. All CoD 4 needed to be "perfect" was removing Juggernaut & Double Tap, more attachment options, better private match settings, and a few minor things.

I'd like anyone to try and disagree with that.

I think they should bring back SP, it was in COD4, WAW & MW2 and those games were fine. What people seem to not understand is this, in MW2 FAL was a high power rifle, it took 2/3 shots to kill, adding stopping power to it did not make a "real world" difference so to speak. Im not exactly sure on the numbers but it was something like this: Health was 100, rifle damage was 55, adding SP made it like 65 or something that means you still had to get 2 upper body shots or 3 body shots. This was the general rule.

What it did do though was make weaker weapons a viable option, so weapons which are considered garabge now because they are too weak could be brought into your rotation. Something like the Vector.

As for the level playing field argument, there isnt one simply because different weapons deal different amounts of damage so there will always be a disparity.

Personally, in MW2 i never used SP on high power rifles, I used hardline when rocking the scar or M16, cold blooded for the snipers and most of the time light weight for SMG's. Bringing it back now will give a very good alternative, Increased weapon damage or invisibilty, both very good. Plus with the huge selections of weapons at our disposal you'll never be forced to use any as a counter measure.

With that combo if you could not get OHK with the .50 every time you either had bad aim or lag issues. When ever I ran that in that game I always got OHK, Never did it take two for me ever doing that unless serious laggg was the problem, no lag=osk every time. But then again I only ever aimed for the chest area and not the lower body either. Not saying your aim is bad, but something was going on for you to ever need two. I only ever saw a hitmarker with that combo and weapon was when the game was laggggy.