realityx8 wrote:

 

Personally I'd feel much better being killed by a quickscoper than your run of the mill famas/galil/ak47u retard (talking black ops, replace with ACR/skar/ump for mw2)....every time I get killed by some tryhard with ghost pro sleight of hand pro silent galil I die a little inside. 

You die inside by people just playing the game as intended...

That is sad.

youtubedude wrote:

 

lol HC, less then 10% of the community plays that. And on top of that, a full auto machine gun already has an advantage over a 1 round per second bolt action. If sniping was so easy, everyone would do it.

---

YouTubeDude

lol... your statistics are a touch off.

... just sayin'.

An m82 weighs in are more like 30 lbs.

That said, your point about realism is very valid. For myself, I must admit that I play video games as a break from real life, so I don't exactly get to worried about realism.

To be a little more on topic, I agree that quick scoping snipers are irritating.I have no objection to aim assist being removed from sniper rifles. As long as you have your target roughly centered, you should be able to acquire your target once you ADS.

Hey OP-Relax. Sometimes people do not agree with you. It does your point no favors to get so worked up that you end up loosing your credibility.

I don't understand where you're getting your logic from.. Aim Assist has little effect with quickscoping at all. When you quickscope, you'll only get the kill if you have the crosshairs on the guy for that split second of when you have your scope zoomed in. When you don't have your scope zoomed in, then it's just like a no-scope. It's completely random of where the bullet will go.

lmfao. No chance at all on this petition working. They aren't going to alter it all just for some pumped up guy who thinks snipings for little kids.

Besides as zachdavis11 said. Aimassist generally just applies for hip stance where it can auto lock a target. Never once have I had an ADS sniper scope auto lock onto someone.