As stated in http://www.callofduty.com/message/10351#10351
I don't quick-scope. Couldn't if I tried. (and I have tried. Failed horribly.) I do use the Sniper 90% of the time though. (99% of the time in MW2)
Do I have an issue with quickscopers? Answer = Nope. I am skilled enough to be able to get positive K/Ds against them, so who cares? For those that complain about quickscopers: become more tactical. Don't just run and gun. Utilize your team, Set up spotters, runners and coverers and open up your own can of ownage. Build your skill. Teach by example, not by running your mouth off like a 12 year old crying foul play.
@ifrerkinbr4di: You have gone about this all wrong. Let me point out the issues in your arguments that are currently working against your cause.
1: Your posts are obnoxious. You have complained this whole time, claiming things such as skill and exploits being foul play and game mechanics abuse. Suggestion: Be civil. Don't complain, and don't challenge people with your meaningless challenges. Make suggestions, yes. Call players who have mastered an exploit/skill (whatever you want to call it) noobs and say they suck? Not likely to help your cause, ol' chap.
2: You have repeatedly told others to stop whining, when you yourself are doing just that. Whining. And about something as trivial as QSing.
3: YOU started this page TO SEE WHAT OTHERS THOUGHT about the issue. THEN, you turned around and told everyone that disagreed with you that they were "stupid, childish, retarded, idiotic, moronic, etc, etc." Good sir, this is not the way to go about things. You asked for opinions, you got them. Take them like an adult. Accept that people have different opinions and respond to them like an adult. Your responses are angry flames about the intelligence of others and the things they bring to the table. If you have half a brain, (and im sure that you do,) then learn to respond without trying to degrade the responses and personal opinions that you got from your thread.
I know this all might sound hypocritical at this point, but really, in some cases I believe people need a little assistance from the "eye for an eye" perspective.
NOW! On to my personal opinion. I say keep AA on the game. It brings in and keeps more newbies to practice different skills on. I personally do not feel threatened by auto aim, regardless of what I am using and what the opponent is using. It's a game mechanic that is there to assist new people, and one that has little to no effect on those players that have honestly honed their skills. I have personally disabled the AA, because I find that it hinders my shots more than helps them. Especially with long range moving targets. Auto Aim wants to follow the body when I want to aim ahead of the enemy to pick them off with more assurance that I will actually get a kill shot, and not just wound/warn them that they are in danger.
That's just my opinion. Keep AA. If nothing else, It will convince the less skilled to become more skilled so that things such as quick scopers are of no significance. That way, someday, they may just die out naturally.
Now, ifrerkinbr4di, when responding, as you most likely will, lets remember these key things: Be an adult. Don't flame like a child. Don't challenge my intelligence just because I have not brought any 'solid evidence' to back my claim. This is opinion. I don't need evidence of it. I believe these are things that you are fully capable of. So, lets see them in action.
! < YOU CAN DISABLE AIM ASSIST > !