You know, being polite isn't really the most important thing in this world.  I would say being intelligent, honest, and open to discussion with a willingness to explain decisions and reasoning are probably more important.  I personally have trouble trusting some things when some topics are given misleading answers.  The reasons for not buffing the AA-12 for instance.  When you originally said you weren't going to buff it, the reasoning was "it's full auto".  Unfortunately for everyone, you left what that meant to the imagination without saying why being full auto mattered.  No one would have guessed that you meant the full auto nature of the gun made the game lag.  You just said "its full auto, therefore it won't be buffed." Now I have to say, I hope everyone starts running the AA-12.  It would give me a laugh on the off chance I ever put MW3 in the disk tray again.

Again, I respect you being on the forums Ghandi, but you can't expect complete respect on a forum where people are talking about some of the worst issues in a game they paid for.  Frustration tends to creep into posts.  Besides, if everyone was completely civil, you couldn't post witty comebacks and I wouldn't enjoy these forums as much as I do.

I feel the AA-12 domintes too much. Can you guys look into decreasing the default mag size, please? Also, can the team focus on buffing the ACR? The 3HK range and fire-rate is too low!

I feel the Striker dominates too much. Can you guys look into decreasing the default mag size, please? Also, can the team focus on buffing the CM901? The 3HK range and fire-rate is too low!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pick one.

mcdonamw wrote:

 

GHANDI,

 

I have a question.  I thought the last TU was supposed to fix matchmaking so that the matchmaking was based on party leader.  Yesterday I started a party with 6 guys total.  4 of us were here in FL and 2 guys in NJ.  I was leader.  We join a lobby and it was a really laggy lobby.  When I checked the scoreboard the two NJ guys were 4 bars whereas us FL guys were all at 3.  What gives?  How did they get better connections to the host than us?  Something doesn't seem right there.

That is something we are actively looking into. I believe it is part of a broader issue we need to resolve next week.

Cheers,

G IH A IN ID II

esmorgue wrote:

 

G IH A IN ID II wrote:

 

sfod-d wrote:

 

@GIHAINDII, This should not be new news to bancandy as i reported this to her on 4/26/2012 via PM on this forum and on PSN.   The two attachments on secondary weapons that is.

That's reassuring. It means it has already been passed to the anti cheat engineering team.

Cheers,

 

G IH A IN ID II

Hows it going G IH A IN ID II? Are you doing any BBQing this weekend?

Thank you for asking esmorgue. I'm good. I'm taking my 4 year old son who refers to the Hulk as Broccoli to see the Avengers (terrible parenting I know - he'll last about 5 minutes before he decides he doesn't want to be a super hero anymore) and then I'll probably end up hitting In-N-Out hard on Monday!

For those who don't reside in one of 5 States this will make no sense. Those that do will know what I mean. Double Double Animal Style!

Cheers,

G IH A IN ID II

ILikeLaglessGames wrote:

 

You know, being polite isn't really the most important thing in this world.  I would say being intelligent, honest, and open to discussion with a willingness to explain decisions and reasoning are probably more important.  I personally have trouble trusting some things when some topics are given misleading answers.  The reasons for not buffing the AA-12 for instance.  When you originally said you weren't going to buff it, the reasoning was "it's full auto".  Unfortunately for everyone, you left what that meant to the imagination without saying why being full auto mattered.  No one would have guessed that you meant the full auto nature of the gun made the game lag.  You just said "its full auto, therefore it won't be buffed." Now I have to say, I hope everyone starts running the AA-12.  It would give me a laugh on the off chance I ever put MW3 in the disk tray again.

 

Again, I respect you being on the forums Ghandi, but you can't expect complete respect on a forum where people are talking about some of the worst issues in a game they paid for.  Frustration tends to creep into posts.  Besides, if everyone was completely civil, you couldn't post witty comebacks and I wouldn't enjoy these forums as much as I do.

I apologise if I was misleading in any way. I felt sure I mentioned ray trace issues and server load before as I did recently when asked about the Striker. That was not my intention.

Cheers,

G IH A IN ID II