Could you imagine the lag that there would be.... Plus Survival is built for 2 players and I like it that way. Any more and people would just be getting in the way

yes i highly agree. That would be great. I say 4 players, considering map size, etc.

PS sorry for posting the same thing ill try to take it down now.

4 players would be aw3some!!!

Me and my friend were contemplating this today in fact that's the only reason I logged onto the forums and yes I think it should be 4 players survival isn't tied down to only two players it's not like there's any reason not to add the extra slots you don't have to redesign much of anything where as with spec ops you would, the missions in spec ops for the most part are made for 1-2 players more then that would be overkil,l in black ops/ world at war the difficulty of enemies in zombies health/damage would be larger based on amount of players I'm hoping a system is implemented like that because as it stands if there's one thing survival needs to make it the best horde-esk experience to date it's that and if there's two things it's the ability to buy killstreaks that you have in multiplayer from the equipment box just throwin that one out there ;P

It would be great to have more than 2 players but 4 is too many therfore I think Survival should be a 3 player mode

Definately up to 4 players. Dont think lag would be an issue, not a problem with zombies...is a real bummer that its only two player

YES! That was the first thing that I thought could be inproved on this game. That was my first problem, not my only problem

Hmm... Spec Ops is really built for two players, so four players could get a bit complex:

-First and foremost, money transfers would need to be more than just a simple button press at the armorys.

-Friendly fire would have to be disabled to prevent trolling.

-Four sentry grenade launchers and riot shield squads were holding down an area? Welcome to Camp Round 50.

-To fix the aforementioned loophole, not everyone would be able to access the same equipment (i.e. some people could get Sentry Guns and Claymores while others would get Paradrop and C4s)

-One guy downed would not = Game Over.

Personally I kind of think 2 players is a bit low, but 4 is high. They should make 3-player Co-op (which is a highly neglected concept in video games).

i hope that the surval does go to four player, because then maybe you could go farther using delta squads and sentries. problem though is that there could be 20 people playing at the same time because of the delta squad for each person. what they need to do is limit the use of the squad and the sentries

i hope that the surval does go to four player, because then maybe you could go farther using delta squads and sentries. problem though is that there could be 20 people playing at the same time because of the delta squad for each person. what they need to do is limit the use of the squad and the sentries

dude I totally agree, i hate having people over and only playing against each other, a  4 man survival game would be off the chain for friends and I, maybe in the next game they'll add it in

and more air suppurt like charlie team or something and they are armoured

i dont understand what they have funn with 2people????? its realy BOORRINGGGG

there should be a choice for more players yer it may be easier but whether its 2 or 10 surley thats our choice