-
Nope I dont want a nuke although it has a tie into something that could happen(CoD4)(MW2) then it could be used. but I didn't like it people camped for nukes...

- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Yeah I agree how people camped for them, but maybe make it more difficult to get instead of 25 kills, maybe like a 35-40 kill game ending surprise?
- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Vinnycenzo wrote:
Yeah I agree how people camped for them, but maybe make it more difficult to get instead of 25 kills, maybe like a 35-40 kill game ending surprise?
haha that'd be crazy you'd have to just cap like 35-40 flags in one dom game XD
- Report Abuse
-
Like (1)
-
NO, JUST NO. It literally promoted camping on objective games, i hate nuke campers on MW2, you know what i do if i see one? i stand next to him shooting in the air. And then i get some hate messages but i atleast got rid of a noob.
The reason to why my friend sold his MW2 was because of all the nukes, i still play it, and i keep annoying nuke-campers.
- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
the only fun i got from the nuke was hunting for boosters in ffa
- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
The Nuke is the Stuff. You dont necessarily need to camp for it. Well I play Domination so its easy to get those 7 to get it started.
- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
The nuke is a HUGE unfair advantage, meaning that you can just end the game because you got a lot of kills on a OBJECTIVE gametype, sounds as retarded as it is.
- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Agreed
- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
I think if they had made killstreaks not stackable, nuke would have been fine.
- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
no one would ever get one then lol
- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Vinnycenzo wrote:
Does anybody else feel like the nuke was a fun objective to play for?
No... and it's not in the game.
Thanks for the discussion.
- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)