FORUMS_

I want to see it hurry up with the video

If you block the names and it is merely showing the reaction caused by lag switching. First off from the victims point of view. Though theater isn't the best way to prove it, if it showing the actually freeze then I don't see a problem. It's still up to Commandante though.

I haven''t seen this much cheating/glitching/boosting since MW2, the only thing that might come close was the rampant boosting in MW3 infected but overall I think there is more cheating in blops 2 than any other COD since MW2.

I'll write up a response to your initial reaction soon, but I'm going to address us moving it first.

You've created a suggestion for the site. That being the request for us to cast judgment on and endorse a user generated resource which treads on existing policies and procedures. This will set a precedent for the entire site if we allow you to do this. This is why it is a site issue to us and why we moved it.

You must remember that this is not your forum. You are not at liberty to dictate the rules. That's our job. It's obvious that you disagree with us and that is fine, but your accusations are entirely incorrect and they are seriously marring any chance of us considering this.

The reason as to why it was moved without statement is because these discussions are best left to me. I'll talk to the moderators and have them be a bit more open to communicating when a subject is something that needs my input.

We're not going to fold against your threats of retaliation for simply following through with our set procedures. This is how our forum and many other forums work.

Again, I'll issue a response to the main bulk of the thread, but I do not have a window for you when to expect it.

This is a constant battle, but here's the skinny on why we do not allow people to name and shame. To make it easy we'll break it down into bullet points and then expand on them.

We disallow name n' shaming because of the below.

1. Lack of embedded staff.
2. User failure to provide proof.
3. Potential for harassment.
4. Preventing a toxic environment.

Lack of embedded staff: While it is true that developers browse this forum, there is unfortunately no embedded staff who have the responsibility, public or not, of fielding user reports of "cheaters." We have the in-game system and it is the primary resource for reporting. You may disagree with this based on your empirical data, but it does not negate the fact that staff are not present for the task.

User failure to provide proof: Many reports from the community surface as written statements that lack evidence or even references to the event occurring. The potential for malicious intent is large in this scenario and we moderators find it threatening to community health. You don't have to take my word for it either. Perform a search and you can find people who come to the boards stating that someone claimed they reported said person for cheating because they lost. It's toxic. The community even questions those who come to the boards to "fess up." People often state that said users are attempting to malign innocent victims. Again, the level of gray is unfortunate and damning.

Potential for harassment: This isn't common, but it does happen. It's also a rather large reason as to why we prohibit name n' shaming. Some people find that they have a need to follow up on someone's report and not only attack the user but question or comment upon their actions. That is harassment via the first party service one uses to engage said peer. That's a distinct violation of said service's TOU and COC. We care about our users, though you may disagree, and do not want our forum to be a platform for someone to possibly hurt themselves and their credibility in the process.

Preventing a toxic environment: In the end we're not only protecting our community, but also taking into account the possible innocence of other users. We moderators do not want to be responsible for creating or allowing a platform to negatively impact someone's experience because of a misguided vigilantism. We care deeply about this community and Call of Duty, but as stewards of but a small portion we must take much into consideration.

The above are our reasons and I hope that I have explained them well. We only ask that users comply with them along side our other governing text.

Hi there - what is your youtube account as I would love to see this. I've often suspected people are cheating/boosting but not convinced...