pistols shouldn't have the same advantage as a primary!!
Posted by Catfishbillyy on Jan 18, 2013 11:43 AM
PERIOD.
-
Like (0)
Posted by Catfishbillyy on Jan 18, 2013 11:43 AM
PERIOD.
If they cost the same amount of points, they should be just as effective. PERIOD.
Actually I wouldn't mind seeing pistols having a limited amount of ammo to them. LIke maybe only two clips. It would make extended clips more usfull as well. It would also make them a back up weapon not a primary weapon.
That would be an interesting twist on pistols. Or perhaps only have one clip.
that logic is irrelevant because the weapon is considered a secondary, which means its the weapon you use when you have no ammo in your primary. i can't use a pistol for a primary now can i? no, so that means the primary weapon is stronger, and if its stronger there should not be an equal firefight with a pistol. PERIOD.
then explain hardwired, dead silence, and awareness, and cold blooded to a degree
Sorry I just have to say this ![]()
Pistol is a secondary? so it should not be as strong as a primary... right?
SMAW is also a secondary. I believe it has a bit more power than all primaries.
flak jacket literally makes it borderline useless for killing
PerEverto13 wrote:
If they cost the same amount of points, they should be just as effective. PERIOD.
Which is why Bouncing Betties shouldn't have been nerfed because Claymores are much better.
and the smaw only has 1 rocket! so regardless of how powerful it is, you fire it once, and have to pick up a another secondary
True. It actually will defend you sometimes while you have a direct impact.
Still I don't really see the problem with the pistols.
I can understand that the machine pistols might be a bit OP? But I like it that they aren't useless for once.
Even though I mostly run ballistic knives anyway. (also secondary and OHK
)