maccabi wrote:

 

G IH A IN ID II wrote:

 

Hello all,

 

For example, I doubt anyone here would have been interested if we posted that at some point we'd increased our backend DB write caching efficiency. Why? Because it has no palpable impact on the game experience.

 

 

Cheers,

 

G IH A IN ID II

I would. I love hearing about stuff like that  

 

hello ghandi btw hope life in the upper echelons of the Activision corporate nether regions is treating you well matey.

'Tomorrow' & DB caching efficiency in rapid succession! There's always one!

I'm good thanks maccabi.

Cheers,

G IH A IN ID II

kastro187420 wrote:

 

G IH A IN ID II wrote:

 

For example, I doubt anyone here would have been interested if we posted that at some point we'd increased our backend DB write caching efficiency. Why? Because it has no palpable impact on the game experience.

 

Lastly, regarding the TU that most of you are waiting for, news of this will be coming shortly.

 

Cheers,

 

G IH A IN ID II

 

I'm with Maccabi on this one. I actually enjoy technical details. Even if it doesn't have a direct impact on the game, it at the very least shows you guys didn't wait a month or two to make one minor change. It shows just how much went into the patch and can help explain why they seem delayed sometimes.

This...plus when we all downoaded a 20+ meg update that was "only for 24/7 playlists" we knew tha was a load of BS. The delayed admittance is just frustrating and further hinders the entire guise of "community."

maccabi wrote:

 

pulling69 wrote:

 

kastro187420 wrote:

 

G IH A IN ID II wrote:

 

For example, I doubt anyone here would have been interested if we posted that at some point we'd increased our backend DB write caching efficiency. Why? Because it has no palpable impact on the game experience.

 

Lastly, regarding the TU that most of you are waiting for, news of this will be coming shortly.

 

Cheers,

 

G IH A IN ID II

 

I'm with Maccabi on this one. I actually enjoy technical details. Even if it doesn't have a direct impact on the game, it at the very least shows you guys didn't wait a month or two to make one minor change. It shows just how much went into the patch and can help explain why they seem delayed sometimes.

This...plus when we all downoaded a 20+ meg update that was "only for 24/7 playlists" we knew tha was a load of BS. The delayed admittance is just frustrating and further hinders the entire guise of "community."

ya know if they mentioned every single things changed in the patch notes it would be more boring to read than jk rowlings new book

There is truth to that, but to say "this patch is only for_______" is disingenuous at best. Just throw us a bone

pulling69 wrote:

 

There is truth to that, but to say "this patch is only for_______" is disingenuous at best. Just throw us a bone

yeah i see your point there,

it would be better if they said we did this..that and the other  AND a heap of backend stuff that doesnt affect the game.

hey maybe elite premium subscribers could get longer patch notes.. be nice to get something worthwhile out of it

teanah wrote:

 

I am putting the latest patch notes update here:

 

Title Update 23

Significantly reduced lag spikes caused when someone joined a match in progress.

Added more matchmaking/performance telemetry to allow us to optimize our backend servers

New networking code improvements to be initially rolled out in the Domination playlist October 10th, mid-morning with more playlists to come

Looks to me like another placebo. Try to get more players on a particular playlist to improve regional matchmaking. Not a fix, a diversion.