Go to original post
-
You get an old map revised and given to us free and people complain.
They want a DIFFERENT map for example.
The reason I am sure they give us one is to try new weapons , gametypes etc to play it on.
At least THIS time you dont have one shot tubes everywhere.
Look at the good side. They didnt charge us for it like some of the old DLCs.
If we had to pay for it then RIGHT we should complain but the fact they gave it to use as a gift, it still comes down to the thought that counts. Its not like your parents giving you ANOTHER turtle neck sweater for when it gets cold in South Texas
Then you have to wear that thing until you go back home 
Sure sometimes an enemy holding off one side of the map sucks, like that one time on Jungle when they held the riverbed side and wiped us out. But thats the part of the game. I like getting our butts kicked as well as wiping the floor with noobs.
I dont think though that it matters if the map is old or new. People are going to learn all the good points in the map regardless if its day 1 or day 1000 of the map. Regardless if the "update the map" or not.
----------------------
And even though I also get long winded I think it is usually better to generalized in the first few sentences and then get into the meat of the issue. That way people dont just skim over the wall of text.
I try to post with a new sentence when adjusting the point. Dont know if it works or not.
It was a good read for people interested in the subject but I think maybe with the type of people in the forum it needs to be structured a little more.
PS I know this last part is like calling the kettle black but just an opinion as well
Fior example
"...to go backward, I want something new and innovative. My second reason is that..."
Should probably have went like this
"...to go backward, I want something new and innovative.
My second reason is that..."
