Listen you pro-qsers, we're in the blops forums. You're going to keep getting ribbed for advocating this, and I along with a lot of others are going to keep going.
You want to qs, go to mw3's forums and play mw3. PLENTY of fellow qsers for you all to agree with.
I don't understand why people cry over quickscopers.. If you're doing it, its fun. If you aren't, it's easy to kill them. When i snipe, if i have the time i will hardscope and get a confirmed kill.. if they pop out, i'll attempt to quickscope them before they kill me... wouldn't you? trick shotters are just funny to watch. Leave it.
Umm, Not to sound like the obvious answer here but...
It's only a game, you don't have to be what everyone else is.
Let me start off by pointing out whoever brought up the "realism" excuse. (Because I strictly cannot say it is a factor.)
First, this is Call of Duty, not Battlefield. If you wanted a realistic military simulator, try that series. I hear parabolic trajectories are implemented on bullets too. (Like they should.)
Secondly, The whole quickscoping arguement is complete and utter bull. The person who figured that out did so by trying out stuff nobody else did. They wanted to be different. I play with Dual Skorpions in MW3, where everyone and their Grandma's use ACR Silenced, and I beat them 9 out of 10 times. I figured out a fun weapon setup that is effective and satisfactory.
Thirdly, I like Black Ops, WAW, and other treyarch products, but they tryed to sue the co. that started the CoD series on the grounds that they were stealing the series and won. Just a heads up to whoever said they were a "smart, innovative co." which im not saying they aren't, but they are definatly seedy.
Finally, I hear Activision has implemented a system into all their games in which you can quit at any time, isn't that neat?
Seriously, if you're complaining about realism... Wake up already!
You're playing Call of Duty.
Now stop spamming messages and get to prestiging!