Jun 19, 2012 11:57 AM
why dont they add new weapons, kill streak, or perks in dlc. why only maps packs
-
Like (0)
title says it all
theres enough guns and killstreak no need for more
Because then the game could become very imbalanced. The standard perks would have to be able to counter the DLC perks....the KS's would have to be able to be countered by standard weapons and such....etc....that is why the do not do that in a DLC. Also...could you imagine the rage that would follow for people that did not want to download this?
jwaller123 wrote:
Also...could you imagine the rage that would follow for people that did not want to download this?
How about the nighmare of matchmaking. It is already bad enough that many times I join a lobby to have it ask me to disable the map packs in order to find more players. Add a new DLC of guns, ks and perks and I can only imagine it getting worse.
Why get the next game in the series if the current one has all of the weapons, kill streaks and perks in it ![]()
This^ and that theres not really a huge demand for it compared to maps(which they cant even put out)
I think it would keep things fresh if they added weapons packs. It would not unbalance the game at all. Everyone uses different weapons as it is now. (You don't see everyone running around with a Scar right?) They could probably even sell one or as a set. It would be cool to see them bring back guns like the TAR, Steyr-Aug, Galil or new ones never before seen on COD.
Activision would make money, we'd be happy.
GHOSTxWOLF wrote:
Everyone uses different weapons as it is now.
I really hope that statement is meant to be a joke.
Then it would have to turn into an MMO......
The game has already grown stale for me. Even just a couple added guns could keep me going for a whole month. If you think there is already enough stuff in the game, maybe you haven't played the game long enough to get tired of them yet.
Whether or not it makes the game unbalanced depends on IWs mental capacity to balance the freakin weapons.
Anyway about the topic, the reason why they haven't added any guns or anything has to do something with memory issues.
they cant fix game u wanna new guns !!!!
As has been said many times before by the devs; the way guns, perks and streaks are implemented into MP is different than that of say a map.
A map only has to be loaded once into everyones match, a gun on the other hand must be loaded for EVERYONE in said match, not only to see, but also to use, you see where this is going; every gun, with every camo and every selection of attachments must be loaded for everyone at once, so that if you were to pick one up, you could see and use it, which eats into system memory.
The amount of guns added into MP is always at its max on release day, any less and people would begin to moan that they deliberately left stuff out.
Also, before you say it, guns are added differently into MP than they are to spec ops or the campaign; so even if the AK74U is in the campaign, it can't be added to MP.
The AK74u actually is on the game's multiplayer multiplayer files. It probably got deleted though to free up memory for other things.
It was replaced with the PP90M1 super soaker or the hideous looking and feeling gun, the FAD if i recall.
Either way, unless they remove a gun already useable, there is no chance any other gun can be added, which will never happen, there will always be someone moaning that the gun they removed was their favourite, or that they had it in gold etc
I would assume that they would not want to split up the player base any more than they already do with the map packs.
It would obviously be unbalanced to have some players having "better" weapons than others. You can argue that weapon choice is a mater of preference, but imagine if say the following were DLC only (Type 95, Striker, MP7, L118A, MG36) The only fair way to handle it would be to keep those with the DLC weapons separate from those without.
It already takes a long time to find a match with the DLC enabled (and it is rare when those games connect well) You basically have the following:
Those without DLC (obviously the majority of players)
Those with Elite Premium + those with DLC 1 and DLC 2 (I think the second largest group)
Those with DLC 1 only
Those with DLC 2 only
Keep in mind that as soon as they release more DLC the players with DLC 1 and DLC 2 will split off from the Premium members and become their own group.
Releasing weapon DLC would effectively double the number of groups. Unlike map DLC you couldn't just turn it off, and search for a group without it. You would have to change all your custom classes if you turned it off.
You are basically left with two options.
1 Fracture the player base even more, and make good connecting games become less frequent.
2 Make the people that don't have the DLC (the majority of players) feel that they are at an unfair advantage because they didn't buy the new weapons. This will likely cause them to stop playing the game.
i think they should have done atleast some gun dlc over these damn face off and infected **** and instead of some of these new ass crap maps. the guns are getting boring ive used all the stuff on all the guns and in variety and id like to see more guns but i highly doubt it will happen one can dream though i suppose
Well they could pull it off acctually seeing as battlefield 3 can do it, But the guns had to be really balanced after the dlc because there were op. So thats why they dont probally do it. Honestly id love to at least see some new guns such as the tar-21 my favorite gun but i doubt it will ever happen.