@GHANDI

Hey man, please lobby to release Face Off maps in FFA and FFA Gunplay. Also, I think it would be great to put in 3v3 and 4v4 in the Face Off mode. 1v1 is lame IMO so if a sacrifice is needed to do that you have my vote. But anyway for sure put the maps in FFA and FFA Gunplay.

Danmc wrote:

 

This happened last night.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3BsQrmLU00

Dont worry. The Devs in charge of weapons say shotguns are good. Its all in your mind. Its not like it happens all the time....... oh wait, it does.

GHANDI,

I apologize if it's been answered already, but why is the final game winning killcam skipped if the guy that died immediate leaves after dying?  I don't even think that person has to dashboard and I know the person isn't the host.

I don't understand why the final cam is dependent on the dying party to be present during the playing of the video.  That seems like a bug.

Matchmaking still does not work , even with dlc turned of it still goes through the whole cycle of pings , worked fine before tu 10. Is this ever going to be fixed , game is great when it works.

maccabi wrote:

 

Snipingdbag wrote:

 

Do what Dexter said from the start. Lower the ping intervals back to mw2 standards. How can I get a 3 bar while the game is in its prime in tdm (the most popular game mode) with a high speed direct Internet connection, open port with all the right mw3 ports open. 25 Ping intervals means Lag vests. We should be mainly playing in 4 vs 4 bar lobbies while the game is in its prime in big game modes at least.. 

you realise it makes no difference past a placebo effect for those advocating the smaller increment jumps right?

 

you'd end up with longer matchmaking times only to be placed in exactly the same sessions as you would've on this system.

Yeah we understand that, but by increasing the range of sessions that can be found with each jump, increases the amount of chance that a player(s) with a slower ping to a host are matched up with a player(s) that have a fast ping to a host. Thus increasing the chances of finding matches at the sacrafice of players being not synced.

So for example: Player 1(DSL)       Finding games <100ms

                         Player 2(Fiber)      Finding games <100ms

Imagine Player 1 and Player 2, they can both find sessions of any value below 100ms. So say they both get into the same 90ms session. Even though they are both pinging that session at 90ms, they are not using the same connection. I would say that Player 1 would have a disadvantage against Player 2. This is were lag comp would come in to help. However, Player 2 should have been able to easily get into sessions of below 50ms, <60ms, or <70ms. But since it jumps from <50ms to <100ms, you can see the problem that was created. The range of players with faster connections and slower connections playing together has increased and thus the range of disadvantage and advantage is more noticable. In MW2 the 10ms intervals gave the players like Player 2 more chances to be matched with players of the same connection, hence <50, 60, 70. Since these intervlas were increased and disadvantage/advantage has increased, the default lag comp code/value that was set in MW2 would surley not work as well for MW3 because of this. And this is where your talk about interpolation comes in. 

Now take into affect different/misconfigured routers, packet loss, net load, jitter into each players connection, and the small change that was made into MW3 just became a lot bigger. DSL has a lot more jitter than a fiber connection, especially if it's not just the player on the connection. Don't fix what wasn't broke.Hope I came clear on this.

And mac didn't you say the intervals in MW2 were set when IW was trying to find a fix for lag or something in a rush. Are we not learning from history of a past title?