Seems a valid restriction to me. You won't get much support on this forum. Sorry.

Sorry man i just dont get it ! If you win 100k op,id think it would be ok if you could win another in a year.And to not play in any ops because there is a chance youd win and not be eligible to win a op that may or may not come up in less than 90 days...Just seems like a real shot in the dark..The odds are real slim you'd win one let along two !!!

I think this is way better !! Cause now every good player can win some and not only the 10 best players compete an other for the bigg price's, i was wondering if they would implement a rule like this looks like they came true.  Every good player should have a change 2 win and not only the Top

I'm sorry but you all need a couple english courses. This is some of the worst writing I've ever seen, when you try to make an argument nobody is going to take you seriously if you can't form a basic sentence.

realjoker your an idiot by the way, "if your good actually a good player then you'll win." There 100k worth of players in every op, just because your a good player does not in any way guarantee you'll ever win, let alone win more than once. In now way does this compare to the Lakers or Manchester United. They compete against around 30 other teams, we compete with over 100,000 per match. Plus the Lakers aren't winning a give away prize, they're bringing people to the stadiums and bringing in revenue for the league. You winning does nothing for them at all, you are literally just getting a free gift.

Stop being a greedy piece of **** .

Of all the rules to get added....

I agree in that there needs to be a way for people in the ~100-1000 to be able to get something out of ops, (i.e. keep to their promise of "every" player having an opportunity to win something) but to essentially dismiss those who regularly finish in the ~1-99? It's silly.

There really needs to be a division system in place. I know... "But people will play bad so they can qualify in the lower divisions and win". That's why you only offer the best prizes to the best divisions. If people want to cheat the system and screw up their own record so they can win a hat, well all the power to them. If I had the ability to win an 100K op, I know I'd rather go for a 100K op worthy prize.

It could even be made so that once you win a few ops in one division, you move up to the next.

It's a silly rule. It needs to go.

i think that when the 100k days are here top of all 3 teirs should win somat so people who aint as good say who get top of bronze will get somat maybe not mutch but somat then top silver will get a little better prize  its not that its hard to cheat to get top of a teir as the stats are changing all the time p.s ban all the cheats