FORUMS_

iloveshotguns wrote:

 

I wanna see killstreaks limited to support killstreaks (uav, emp, sam turret, etc.) and 1 use killstreaks (pred missles, air strikes, strafe run, etc.)

 

Nothing slows down gameplay and ruins the experience for others more then air support that feels like it lasts forever.

Pull out a Stinger. Or is it maybe the noise that just bothers you because you actually run Blind Eye on all of your classes? The noise of killstreaks takes away from the peaceful, relaxing experience I guess. Blind Eye isn't good enough we just need to get rid of all the killstreaks. Yeah I think this thread is full of Blind Eye nubs.

coolwhhhip wrote:

 

The notion that stacking killstreaks makes people camp to get them (and i guess the argument people are trying to make here is that that in turn slows down the game) has been completely destroyed now that we have seen how slow Black Ops was. It actually has the opposite effect. Killstreaks stacking means more killstreaks, which means people die more, which means more people are then respawning and running around trying to reestablish themselves in the game more. No, if your going to argue against stacking killstreaks then just come on out and say that you like a slower, more peaceful game, similar to Black Ops. We can obviously do away with what was the most horrible idea in cod history, putting trash like a Stealth bomber, EMP in a Support Package or deathstreaks, but more killstreaks are needed to keep people moving. It's cool if you want a slower more peaceful game, but just say that. The fact is, it's way easier for good players to run up scorelines in BO, but that isn't fun after awhile. I like chaos and competition, BO makes me want to bash my own brains out with how dull it is. Blackbird, chopper gunner, dogs. Rinse, repeat. I don't mind if I die a few more times in mw3 because of random stuff or because more killstreaks are up, because i know others will be dying a few more times too and that keeps people respawning and thus moving and this makes the game more intense and more confrontational. Im firmly of the belief that a lot of people that complain about mw3, started with BO and got used to how peaceful it was, and/or they are the campy nonconfrontational types that get online to have a relaxing, peaceful experience. IW games present a problem for that so we see what we see on here a lot except under the guise of patch this or patch that, remove akimbo, remove machine pistols, remove quickscoping, and on and on we go. These people don't like character in their games, they don't want randomness, they want all of the guns to have the same exact damage, nothing at all can be unbalanced, they really just don't want to have fun.

 

IW vs 3arc = Confrontational people vs Sittin in a corner makin a PBandJ type people.

They do have a chance here with BO2 to redeem themselves though. Maybe they will run the weener types off for good. Lol. Let em know they don't have a home in treyarch's games anymore either.

MW/IW = fast action, lots of damage, lots of killstreak spams.

Blackops/3arc = Lower damage, earned killstreaks, more tactical approach to game play.

Both appeal to different people and which is why call of duty continues to be so successful. People play one game and start wanting to play something else, then the next title comes out and delivers it to them. Really is a genius move using two developers who come at the game differently every other year.