Currently Being ModeratedMay 3, 2012 6:36 AM (in response to XXXScarFac3XXX)Re: WHICH IS BETTER MW2 OR 3?
MW3. Why? It's much more balanced:
1. All perks have a counter (No Stopping Power, Commando or Danger Close)
2. Rank progression is better (Blind Eye is available early, so you don't have to endure getting killed by airsupport until you unlock the perk)
3. Explosives have been nerfed and explosive spam has been reduced (Scavenger no longer resupplies explosives)
4. You can customize your kill streaks for each class
Probably other reasons, but thats all I've got for now.
Message was edited by: KingRollo
Currently Being ModeratedMay 5, 2012 8:36 AM (in response to KingRollo)Re: WHICH IS BETTER MW2 OR 3?
U ARE WRONG
mw3 is worst cod ever, killed the series. when bops came out, there were 2 milion ppl online, when mw3 came out, there wer 1 mil
balanced????support killstreaks that KILL
OP weapons, more than MW2
disc is cheap(mine broke on first day, had to return it)
and LAST STAND!! anyone remember in cod xp(i was watching stream) when Bowling said
"NO FINAL STAND!!!!!!"
Crowd - "WOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!"
they lied to us ,and stole our money.
hopefully BOPS 2 can redeed cod from its MW3 garbage
Currently Being ModeratedMay 2, 2012 9:11 PM (in response to XXXScarFac3XXX)Re: WHICH IS BETTER MW2 OR 3?
Modern Warfare 2 was the most unbalanced multiplayer. It was all about the cheapest tactics (OMA tubing, Commando Knifing), and ridiculous firepower (Shotguns and Machine Pistols as secondaries).
I would gladly take lag compensation (which does not effect me), over MW2 anyday.
Currently Being ModeratedMay 2, 2012 9:14 PM (in response to thebiindsniper)Re: WHICH IS BETTER MW2 OR 3?
mw2 in my opinion was the worst call of duty, but was very fun. It was extremely unbalanced, unlike mw3. Mw3 is very balanced for the most part, at least in comparison to mw2. But COD4 was and will forever be the best video game that ever existed.
Currently Being ModeratedMay 5, 2012 12:51 PM (in response to XXXScarFac3XXX)Re: WHICH IS BETTER MW2 OR 3?
Both have their great points and both have their horrid. I still enjoy playing both. If you took the best of MW2, added the best of MW3, took out all the cheap stuff and you'd have an awesome game.
Currently Being ModeratedMay 5, 2012 6:00 PM (in response to XXXScarFac3XXX)Re: WHICH IS BETTER MW2 OR 3?
Comparing both games in their prime;
Guns; mw2 (better balanced, though smgs should get a range P and the Ump had way too low damage drop off in mw2, being a 3 hit kill across the map)
Perks; mw3 (this killed the game in mw2 and you can't even call it a shooter do to DC Pro tubes and MLC knifing which is both game ruining / uber annoying, this said I had fun with explosives in mw2).
Killstreaks:mw3 (specialist is awesome, support mweh, but then again if you get a high score you can spam it more often than shi-t players)
Maps; mw3 (I love small-mid big and hectic, plus a lot of mw2 maps have a strange sand storm or whatever it's, it's annoying).
Hit detection & matchmaking / game performance online; mw2
Player movement; mw2 (getting stuck and not being able to go over anything basically is pretty fckin annoying mw3).