Honestly, you could make that into a tank alone. If you could build something like that to carry more weight and fire an unmanned turret/grenade launchers onto it it's basically a tank.
I did, and I understand that perfecting an idea is never easy. But that's how we got the Abrams today. We kept on evolving from one tank to another. All I'm going to say is that God knows when walking/flying tanks will be made. No one knows, the possiblities are endless. It is not impossible, but doable. Only question left is when it will be introduced/perfected to soceity.
IcyRapture wrote:
Honestly, you could make that into a tank alone. If you could build something like that to carry more weight and fire an unmanned turret/grenade launchers onto it it's basically a tank.
I know you watched the trailer since you have managed to comment on every aspect of every single post. Those walkers were MASSIVE that dog is puny and can barley walk. I could go push it over. Have you thought about what would happen when if a massive walking tank were to be knocked over? Did you read what I said in my quote of the video? Have you thought about legs vs treads and what would be the reason for replacing them. Christ...
HAHA Trolls are so much more fun when they're idiots.
th3_im0rtal wrote:
I did, and I understand that perfecting an idea is never easy. But that's how we got the Abrams today. We kept on evolving from one tank to another. All I'm going to say is that God knows when walking/flying tanks will be made. No one knows, the possiblities are endless. It is not impossible, but doable. Only question left is when it will be introduced/perfected to soceity.
Do you honestly believe that we will have walking tanks in 13 years?
It's a tough question because no one knows the answer. Technology is advancing faster these days. It could come to life in 13 years, or not.
Obviously no one knows the answer because it has not happened yet. You still have not answered the question. Do you think the United States of America will have walking tanks in 13 years?
So let me get this straight. Your bitching about an ARCADE shooter not being the most realistic game on the market? Get real
dhgf4m0us wrote:
So let me get this straight. Your bitching about an ARCADE shooter not being the most realistic game on the market? Get real
Has anyone said anything about the most realistic game on the market? First im not bitching. Second Call of Duty has always been about putting you in the boots of a solider/marine/seamen or whatever in a reality based environment. Obviously no COD has ever been the most realistic game ever. Obviously that is the point of the game. By changing the game in this way they are walking away from what COD has been about (in my eyes). That is my 2 cents. It has nothing to do with most realistic game the market. You pulled that out of your ass. This 2025 with walking tanks and a full mech drone army is just going to far.
As previously stated. I'm not sure. If i say yes, then we are just going to contiune on arguing over something that is in a video game (and possibly later on in life, if they make it). If i say no, I'm just gonna ask, if you are 100% that the US will still be using the Abrams in the future, which in turn leads to more arguments about how anyhting can happen in the future.
Let's just drop this already, and just wait patiently for what will be in store for us when more details of the game is released.