FORUMS_

Skeptical. But I have high hopes considering this was done by Treyarch. If this was Infinity Ward I wouldn't even waste money and checking if it's a good game.

I get that they won't have plasma bullets and crap like that, but I just hope they won't make up guns. I want to stick with normal, modern day guns. Such as the SCAR, M416, AR15, ect. I will not buy the game if it has fake "future" guns in it. P.S. When there is a Nazi Zombies trailer (If there's a Nazi Zombies trailer) someone please inform me about it. I saw the mystery box light but it's not enough evidence for me.

its based in 2025 so somthings telling me there isnt going to be plasma bullets in the game... no far enough into the future

This is only 13 years in the future. We allready have this tech. It is just a matter of time that we use this stuff. We do already use some of this stuff anyway.

realistic? seriously?

i have to agree it does look a bit like halo. but i dont care how "futuristic" it looks i'm simply NOT buying it if there is no zombies. and i agree atto99 we do have lots of this stuff in the military

I am just afraid of how they will make the weapons.I don't want some stypid totally unreal(and i say totally for a reason)and i also i don't want them to copy anthing from BF.BF is very good(not BF3)bu ti don't want Trearch copying from other games,like DICE did with BF3.

I like the futuristic idea, especially since it is near future.  What worries me is what kind of impact will the future tech have on the multiplayer gameplay; namely the walking tank things and mobile turrets?  Is it going to turn COD into Halo?  Player-held weapons will need to at least be capable of taking these out which may mean an increase on small arms fire power.  I'm betting to combat the future killstreaks, either the weapons will be over-powered or the player perks will have to be to compensate.

Looks good to me.

When I first saw the trailer and saw 2025 futuristic stuff, I was annoyed and said "there's no way I'm buying this. How stupid." However, thinking about it, it might not be that bad. After all, Killzone 3 was a fun game. I have a lot of faith in Treyarch - they're very innovative. They make more unique Call of Duty games, unlike the other producers. If they don't butcher the game with too much futuristic BS then they should be fine.

Its taking cod out of its fan base zone. we all started playing either in ww2 or for interest u of simulating a realistic modern feel with friends online. going futuristic is a mistake. and on top of it treyarch is the worst one to send out on a trial like this. They have always been sub par with character models color paletes used in maps and textures on cloths and skin. compared to iw these guys need alot of visual improvement. so to throw the b rate filler company into a whole new idea was just not what id have done. We already know how this will turn out too. the mw3 reveal trailer had less than 20,000 dislikes over a years time and bops 2 in first week has hit 32,000 dislikes. I used to be excited about having 2 companies and getting a new game and maps every year but treyarch just isnt meeting the grphical standards of iw and iw's way of producing interesting map locations like terminal and trailerpark. before looking to the future they need to9 get better at what they started. so i say no future is not a wise choice for a cod title.

this is gona be one big step backwards for cod. am sure the kids will love it i don't think it will be for me