Skip navigation
Up to Discussions in Forums

FORUMS_

8686 Views     103 Replies
1 2 3 ... 11 Previous Next 8686 Views 102 Replies Latest reply: May 3, 2012 1:37 PM by Gaucho2112 RSS
deathsoldier619 Apprentice 154 posts since
Sep 9, 2011

For everyone saying Black Ops II is too farfetched.

Posted by deathsoldier619 on May 1, 2012 10:29 PM

The original Black Ops was set in the cold war era.

So how do you make a sequel to something that explained everything it ever had to?

You ask the question, "what would happen if something similar was to happen, say, in the future?" Black Ops II is essentially set in 2025, during a second cold war. Effectively utilizing the considerably more technologically sophisticated weapon systems that might be available to us.

 

YES it is FUTURE WARFARE but it is not truly as farfetched as everyone seems to think. I didn't think I would need to actually say this but, Black Ops II is in fact set mainly in 2025. It is 2012 people! 2025 isn't as far off as everyone is making it out to be. If you take a look at the technological advancements over the last 15 years, it really isn't hard to imagine how much further it could go in another 13. The game is not set in the year 3000! It's 2025!

 

Think about it... It's not that farfetched..

"The future is not as far off as most people think... We're not ready for it."

 

Cheers,

M4r7i4N out

8686 Views      Tags: call, trailer, xbox, you, reading, youtube, epic, these, baby, black_ops_2, omg!, said
  • Apprentice 298 posts since
    Sep 22, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    callofduty_capers     May 1, 2012 10:37 PM (in response to deathsoldier619)

    Dude the US will not have a mechanized army in 13 years time. Espcially not one large enough to the point if it were taken over it would be a major threat to natinal security. We will not have automated mech killing machines in 13 years. We will not have walker tanks in 13 years. Don't say prove it because that sounds really ignorant. Based of the past and the progression of current technology, it is very unlikley to have mech tanks in 13 years.

  • deathsoldier619 Apprentice 154 posts since
    Sep 9, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    deathsoldier619     May 1, 2012 10:45 PM (in response to callofduty_capers)

    Granted the US probably won't be able to afford a mechanized army in 13 years time. But that's not what we are talking about, is it? The fact is, a significant portion of the technology present in this game actually already exists. Add some extra features and it's there. I'm not saying it's all factual but it does have some weight to it.

  • Apprentice 298 posts since
    Sep 22, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    callofduty_capers     May 1, 2012 10:48 PM (in response to deathsoldier619)

    Walker tanks have zero weight to it. Nothing in the game has weight to it. This game is not possible in 13 years. If they decided to make the game take place in 2200 then maybe it is possible. That is all im saying. This 13 year time gap that Treyarch came up with is just plain crazy. The point is that the US military being anywhere near this advancded in 13 years is straight crap.

  • deathsoldier619 Apprentice 154 posts since
    Sep 9, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    deathsoldier619     May 1, 2012 10:58 PM (in response to callofduty_capers)

    A tank with mechanical legs. What on earth is so crazy about that?

  • Apprentice 298 posts since
    Sep 22, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    callofduty_capers     May 1, 2012 10:59 PM (in response to deathsoldier619)

    Hahaha! You just said that? It is a tank with mech legs walking in 13 years. If you can't figure that out maybe you should stay in school kid

  • deathsoldier619 Apprentice 154 posts since
    Sep 9, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    deathsoldier619     May 1, 2012 11:03 PM (in response to callofduty_capers)

    THE MECHANISMS ARE ALREADY HERE. All they need is to be able to take the weight of the tank. idiot

  • Apprentice 298 posts since
    Sep 22, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    callofduty_capers     May 1, 2012 11:06 PM (in response to deathsoldier619)

    Dude, don't call me an idiot. Obvious mechanical legs exist, but in 13 years time we ill not have tanks that walk. Use your head dude. I didn't insult you so don't go around throwing insults. If you want to play like that it can get ugly real fast. In 13 years the US will more than likely not have an automated mechanized army. Also they will more than likely not have walking tanks. How hard is that to understand.

  • deathsoldier619 Apprentice 154 posts since
    Sep 9, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    deathsoldier619     May 1, 2012 11:09 PM (in response to callofduty_capers)

    HAHAHA oh buddy. When they have people a crap load smarter than you in charge of development, anything is possible.

  • Apprentice 298 posts since
    Sep 22, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    callofduty_capers     May 1, 2012 11:16 PM (in response to deathsoldier619)

    Dude think logically here. Do you honestly believe that in 13 years, think just 13 years, that the US Military will have mech walking tanks. The United States is in such a deficit that we would not waste money on such an idea. There is also nothing wrong with the Abrams tank. It one of the most battle effective and deadliest tanks in existance. We will still be using it in 13 years.

     

    The tank used before the abrams was in use since the 60s dude. It lasted almost 40 years, so the Abrams is going no where.

     

    Also just think back 12 years since 2000. Look how far our military has moved. It has barley had any tehcniological advances. We have had drones since then and they have not changed much. The US has no reason to add walking tanks to their line up. In 13 years there won't be walking tanks. Just give up man.

1 2 3 ... 11 Previous Next

Actions

Bookmarked By (1)