It's funny that you can say a guy who is 0-156 is ACTUALLY supporting his team by shooting down a couple UAV's but if he is 18-156 and calls in an EMP, he isn't doing anything to help his team at all.

grif77775 wrote:

 

because his osprey doesn't stop the other team from put out a sam site or even a UAV, the osprey gunner can be shot down in many different ways but once an EMP goes off there's no way to stop it.

Then they can complain about EMP being in support. But saying that all support killstreak need to be taking out because everyone that uses them go negative everygame and get rewarded is ignorant.

owiseguyo wrote:

 

It caters the bad players

It doesn't cater to bad players. Bad players are going to do bad regardless of whether or not they're using support. Support isn't suddenly going to take a bad player and make them have a great game. However, if you're using assault and you get a predator, you can easily go from 5 kills to 40 kills in a game, simply by letting the game play for you. The assault package has the ability to make an average player look great while the same player using the support package is still going to look average.

I never said remove support, in fact I did say most of it works well for what it does. I don't have a problem with remote sentries, or decoy drops or even the recon jugg. but the EMP is my biggest problem support. Like I said if you want to play anti air theres stingers and sams, but the after effect of an EMP is my biggest problem

I just don't understand why anybody even complains. If someone is going 15-30 in any game mode is it really that devastating that someone called in a Stealth Bomber? Or an EMP?

If he's 15-30 your team is obviously destroying him with something but it's not good enough. He has to be 15-60 and have no way of stopping it. The rich get richer and the poor just die.