Mar 13, 2012 11:13 AM
So, those against dedicated servers need to SIT DOWN.
-
Like (1)
I just finished a couple games of Battlefield 3. (No I'm not a big fan, just bought it 2 days ago because I was tiring of MW3)
Get this - I was somehow in a European Lobby against players from France and Germany.
There was no lag, no hitmarker issues, no player skipping... I didn't realize it until I checked out a few gamertags at the end of a 3 game session. It was as smooth as the BEST connections I've gotten in MW3. (Which may or may not be a side effect of lag compensation.)
This seals it, dedicated servers or I'm not buying the next COD. If Battlefield 3 and Gears of War 3 can manage servers, so can COD. It's absolutely garbage, and we as fans and players deserve better at this point. People need to wake up, and start talking with their wallet, because that's all they care about - stop buying their garbage - find another game to play next fall. (Namely, Medal of Honor: Warfighter. I'm very excited for that now, very.)
Seriously, I've got nearly 700 hours in COD in the past 3 years. I personally dislike EA, but their game is undoubtedly better in every fashion connection wise.
Totally agree
I know that the argument can go both ways with dedicated servers from what Ive read but I don't want to get into that.
The next BF3 DLC is said to be smaller maps and CQC oriented. I think I will be checking that out for sure because like you, I have never been this frustrated by a COD game in my life and I have them all. It's fun but it's not.....I really don't know how else to explain it.
Well I have BF3, and it lags for me. I hate domination which is all BF3 is, cause their TDM is a joke. They cut the map sizes down so theyre all smaller than dome, and the spawns make MW3s look amazing. I dont have half the problems on this game. Play the game you feel is right for you. But nobody is adding servers cause you decided to post a rant. Im sure you know that.
Enjoy the Battlefield series.
TDM is not a Battlefield 3 game mode, it was stuipdly implented for casuals so of course the spawns are bad, BF imo has always been a conquest/Rush game.(Least how I see it.)
And OT: Didn't they say Dedicated servers for CoD would cost way to much money?
Here's a simple reason why Call of Duty doesn't have dedicated servers--the population.
Call of Duty's community is tenfold over Battlefield. And with that many people, means A LOT more servers would have to be made, with A LOT more money to run them, with A LOT more problems that can result in the process.
I don't know the exact knowhow, but there is a very good reason why dedis are not possible for Call of Duty.
~RUGGED SAVIOR
I'm not saying the game is good. (I was actually playing TDM, and yeah I've spawned and died numerous times already) However, FRANCE AND GERMANY? Are you kidding me? I haven't had one lag spike in the games I've played. (Perhaps that's an issue on your side? Granted, I've only got like 4 hours of playtime in... but it only took one game to see lag with MW3)
Of course Activision isn't going to drop servers because of me. But, if you cut into their sales, they might. This also isn't a "rant", it's really an open your eyes type of thing. My eyes were just opened in a huge way 15 minutes ago, so I figured I'd share.
TDm would have been fun, if they still allowed you to use the entire map and the vehicles. Who thought that was a great idea?... Conquest/Rush is not my bag baby.
I suppose, though I still don't see TDM as a BF gametype, I can only imagine the PC players on TDM lol.
+If they had vehicles they would be easily camped cause players still barely shoot down any aircraft or blow up tanks.
![]()