May 2, 2012 1:17 PM
Petition for Next COD (Updated)
-
Like (0)
UPDATE:
All the petitions have been MOVED to the new forum.
http://community.callofduty.com/message/205599383#205599383
THANKS, PLEASE JOIN AND COMMENT there!, on the new forum.
I agree with everything but the guns. They will always be guns over used by everyone. if one gun in not better than the other then there is no point in unlocking new guns if it is the same thing with a different look. And Lag comp has been in every COD it just needs to be tuned down in this game and the next one.
I thought it was the outdated internet structure in the U.S. that was causing the lag issue redneck? Why the change of heart? Which is it too much lag comp or outdated internet structure?
I wasnt the one that said that the other guy was. i was just correcting you. i have always said that the lag comp needs to be tuned down to MW2 settings.
V3LKRO wrote:
I doint care if IW or Treyarch are doing the next game, but please keep it simple and fun, the way it used to be.
- NO Akimbos
- NO Deathsreaks
- NO Guest Accounts
- NO Unbalanced Perks
- NO Joining a game about to lose
- NO Overpowered Weapons
You guys are making the games SOOO complicated with all that "Fancy" stuff, that you forget the basics of this game, and why we play it.
The next cod will be created by treyarch... alot of people who play cod don't understand treyarch and iw are completely different onlything that are similar are perks.
so, there is no need to list nukes because thats an iw thing and i already know they'll butcher quickscoping like they did with black ops so i know i won't be buying the next cod.
balance will never happen, guest accounts will never be removed, joining a gamethat is over will never be put to a stop and the only thing that will be good is zombies.
they didnt butcher qs. they completely took it out of the game and balanced the snipers so you actually have to snipe. Also if you notice, there wasnt anybody running around with a sniper and an acog with quickdraw.
Im fine with support killstreaks as long as they cant kill you or the AC-130 that i just worked a long time to get
ok
V3LKRO wrote:
- NO Support Killstreaks
Why?
I didn't understand that one. Maybe take Stealth bomber off support that's it.
I've never understood why people hate it so much. Even with the stealth bomber, it's one actual killstreak. People treat it like it takes somebody who is terrible and suddenly make them better. My favorite argument is that it rewards people for playing poorly. That one always give me a good chuckle.
Its not that. The main thing is that the assault kill streaks are all about getting kills while the support ones are supposed to be for supporting but the stealth bomber kills more than it supports.
I agree, partly. If that is the case the UAV shouldn't be in the Assault strike package. I don't have any problems with the stealth bomber being in the support just because of the fact that in a game of DOM it can be a support tool. I know if it was in Assault I would never use it realistically. It could go either way for me but any one who argues that the Support Package is for "bad kids" and "noobs" is sorely mistaken.
The support streaks are for people who want to help there team IMO
Me too. That and for people who don't want to worry about dying killing their chance at getting something. It allows you to play a little more reckless than you would if you're running Assault.
deucedouglas wrote:
V3LKRO wrote:
- NO Support Killstreaks
Why?
No need for morons spamming UAVs, AUAVs, EMP's and Stealth bombers every second.
So the difference between calling in an Assault UAV and a Support UAV is being a moron?
No. You need to get a killstreak to get it in assault. 3 kills without dying. Not 3 kills and 18 deaths. In short- you should be rewarded for doing good, not rewarded for doing horrible.
well technically its called a pointsreak.
Sorry lol. But I meant, no matter how you get the points for the pointstreak, you have to do it without dying and I think that's how it should have stayed.
I think it's funny that probably one of, if not the most, commonly used Assault streaks used is the UAV. And it doesn't kill anybody. And you're not being rewarded for doing horrible, you're being rewarded for taking out air support, playing the objective, and getting kills. A guy who goes 5-40 isn't going to be bombarding the enemy with air support like everybody makes it seem.
Maybe not. But that's almost never what actually happens. It's usually someone on the losing team in Domination losing to 3 flags going 15-30 and they get 5 undeserved kills with a stealth bomber. Most likely with everyone else on their team doing the same thing as well. Even more annoying when they have their killstreaks as UAV/CUAV. They're being rewarded constant killstreaks no matter how much they die. It might not kill me directly, but it forces me to waste a perk slot to put Assassin on.
what're you whining about? you or your team killed that guy 18 times before he could get a uav. oh no, now he can see us...
Cause Support KS its so LAME , its like just make new people excited about getting a KS
I only disagree with the no Akimbo. I prefer akimbo on handguns. Agree on everything else.
Secondary weapons are mean to be as support, not as a primary weapon, as many did and does with the Akimbo.
Please. Handguns Akimbo are still not even half as good as any primary. They would still be used as a backup weapon.
at times, speed IS power. so, running into , say, an LMG user; double P99's would own or pwn them (let's not even talk about FMG's). i don't disagree with akimbo. though i don't generally use it, it brings me back to 'golden eye' days. imagine if you could akimbo primaries (like, have an AK 47 in one hand and an MP5 in the other...) wildly inaccurate, but effective nontheless -starfarce/PS3
so what do you want?
A game not worth playing?
Quit Crying and get good.
I don't mind the support package as long as they don't have pointstreaks like the Stealth Bomber in MW3.
What the support package does is that it balances out the other packages for the slayers & lone-wolfs who prefer the assault & specialist packages. Players who aren't the most confident of all killers can still support their team when it comes to the support package.
- NO Akimbos - akimbo pistols is fine, remove the machine pistols (It'll make Overkill viable as a perk if in Treyarch's next game)
- NO Deathsreaks - AGREED
- NO Guest Accounts - AGREED
- NO Lag Compensation - All COD's in the past have had lag comp. Both BLOPS & MW3 made it noticeable & screwed up the algorithim to lag comp
- NO Unbalanced Perks - I'd like your POV on what perks you find unbalanced
- NO Joining a game about to lose - Problems with matchmaking & matches will become 6 vs. 1 due to players not opting to stay in. Another solution is to not give you a loss & to not affect your stats for the match you joined in progress
- NO Nukes - Don't mind the Nuke/MOAB but keep it out of objective game types. If players wish to achieve nukes/MOAB's, keep it in FFA & TDM
- NO Overpowered Weapons - I'm no expert of weapons but that's up to the devs to make each weapon have it's uses & flaws.
- NO Quickscopes - Remove a perk like SOH Pro/Quickdraw to give snipers a faster ADS (like Black Ops)
COD4/WAW sniping is fine
I agree with no sopport streaks they sometimes reward bad players you don't deserve a Steatlth Bomber with numbers like 16-35 or something in that ball park i want Blops 2 too keep the same killstreak set-up that was in the 1st Blops
People play more reckless, sometime maybe its good but most of the time is not.
i agree with all of this lol.
Ya sure, because petitions always work! :roll: