Thats a pretty terrible post, but its what I've come to expect from you, seeing as how you have always spoken out against more HC.

Thats a nice assumption on your part, but the low score cap doesn't make people do anything different. People still camp, and people can still farm kills, even with the low score cap. There is no incentive to play the objective, only one person gets points for the capture, and there are no points awarded while the HQ is captured. I've been playing for hours, and most games I don't even get 1500 points. So yeah, there is no incentive to play the objective as of now.

I too am very happy they finally added HCHQ, but they are playing with fire with the current setup. Trialstar thinks a short game means people will play the objective, and I disagree.

I just played a match on village, went 35-15, 1 capture, total score = 1800 points. Same match on Black Ops would have read like this: 35-15, 3 captures, around 4000 points. I think there are 2 reasons to play the objective in HQ: get loads of points towards prestiging, and W/L. Right now, you can't do that in an average game. You can win, but plan on watching your prestige progress slow to a crawl.

So, what I think is going to be the result is, a team gets a capture, proceeds to farm kills. I saw a game like that already, 150-0, the other team wasn't trying to capture the HQ, they were just killfarming. Their kills were in the 50s and 60s, and my team (including me) was just backing out by the droves. Is that a good thing?

Get it together IW, thank you for adding more HC, now restore HQ to what its been in every other CoD.

lol, yeah that makes perfect sense. Just goes to show how much i play team tac, else I would have picked up on that too. So yeah, how pathetic, how lazy, how IWish.