Feb 24, 2012 12:20 PM
Discriminating against the GRENADE LAUNCHER?
-
Like (0)
Now this thread will apply to some (not all) but to those who express distaste to the grenade launcher aka "Noob tube" why? I only get two shots! 8 out of 10 of those shots do not kill on the first explosion!
I'm asking this because I played a game and there were two childlike players on my team crying about it, they kept saying and i quote "Really Noob tube" or "That is the dumbest thing to die by a tube" or my favorite "he sucks cause he uses a tube"
This brings me to the following questions: "Does getting killed allot warrant talking Bull-S-h-i-t about someone else's weapon loadout"?
It depends on how it's used really.
Of course, we can't/shouldn't dictate how other people play, but if people use it, similar to Akimbos, like it's a primary weapon and not merely a back-up attachment/weapon for a situation, that's when it's really a noob tube. (A "proper" way being to use it to hit people you know are behind cover or clearing out a group of people in close proximity and such.)
I've seen people go so far as to either run around and shoot it at the first target(s) they see or camp in a corner and pop at people with it that run by, then after depleting their shots, kill themselves with a SMAW, Grenade, or C4 to respawn with a full 2 grenades/whatever based on weapon again and keep repeating throughout the match. Similar with the SMAW itself, M320, XM25, RPG-7, and such.
Or at least they just run into groups of enemies to kill as many as they can before inevitably dying in a suicide run.
MW2 IS THE REASON!!!
Thisguygotcha, I will not argue that point. I admit that I was one of the one man army tube using dudes that you would run into, I admit it, and it was abusive. But you know and I know that all changed in BOPS, now its a commodity or a resources.
Because they are pathetic. They'll whine about DC, yet say CoD4 was balanced and good, yet it had DC in it.
esmorgue wrote:
Because they are pathetic. They'll whine about DC, yet say CoD4 was balanced and good, yet it had DC in it.
CoD4 was insanely unbalanced. Most people are just idiots.
sml7285 wrote:
esmorgue wrote:
Because they are pathetic. They'll whine about DC, yet say CoD4 was balanced and good, yet it had DC in it.
CoD4 was insanely unbalanced. Most people are just idiots.
I found it more balanced due to tier 2 being so tight.
esmorgue wrote:
sml7285 wrote:
esmorgue wrote:
Because they are pathetic. They'll whine about DC, yet say CoD4 was balanced and good, yet it had DC in it.
CoD4 was insanely unbalanced. Most people are just idiots.
I found it more balanced due to tier 2 being so tight.
Also the GL took away your Tier 1 perk.
I agree, Grenade Launchers almost require sniper rifle precision to get a kill (in fact, that's exactly how I use the XM-25).
I personally never had a problem with them. It seems IW gave in to that part of the community who actually believe there is room for skill (and that Grenade Launchers are 'skilless') in a game that has always and will always, revolve only around reaction time.
Yes, they require thought. I agree with your post, i am not sure why they were reduced so drastically. But nevertheless they are skilled based kills.
They are cheap. I don't care if a lot of the time they don't kill in one shot. They shouldn't. Anything that you can aim in the general direction of someone and hit, should not be a one hit kill. It doesn't help the game at all and it only frustrates people.
Cheap, I don't know how to feel about that. You can't just shot them in a direction and kill you have to determine distance / location to get an accurate explosion which will or will not kill. Cheap to use YES hard to be good at YES.
But you cannot use a grenade launcher as a primary, remember we only get two shots and both have to be worth while. But good response.