xTheViking64x wrote:

 

Totally agree with Nightstalker.  I like to play to win the game, not just get kills. 

amen Viking... when i play an objective based game...that's exactly what i do....play the objective.  i'm that guy that will dart out into the open to confirm the kill...even if i die, there's a 50/50 chance that the enemy will retrieve my tags... the point is... it's "Kill CONFIRMED"..not Kill Denies.  the team with the most confirms wins...plain and simple.  if i die 20 times a match, that doesn't mean that the enemy actually retrieved my tags 20 times...but if i get 20 confirms a match..then i got 20 confirms.. i do not get why this is so hard for others to understand..

Only time i get tags is after knifing a guy...

I leave the tags up if team gets them great! If enemy denies... EVEN BETTER cause now i know where they are and kill them thus repeating this idea.

Usually get about 30-50 kills per each KC and even if only 15-25 of those gets picked up we still usually win.

I agree with OP thou, I won't confirm a kill and risk getting killed when I can just let teamates try to get them.

Silliest logic ever.

Someone else joins in on the spray at random, gets one bullet contact, he's obviously better than me.

Shooting someone, falls into final stand, keep shooting, guy throws a stun and gets the kill, he's obviously better than me.

I have more confirms than kills!

Of course he is, if it's intentional and not just a random flashbang. Why? He has a quicker reaction time than you and has the wits to come up with that kind of idea on the fly and therefore is better. Not so silly now is it?