Proof?

The removal of perks would require something else to keep players around. It would not sink well with most of the cod player base because at this point perks are an important part of the CoD series.

Removing pro perks and perks that directly influence gun battles would be a better option. That being said I don't think perks will be removed. But if someone is going to do something new and risky at this point I believe it will be Treyarch.

Personally I believe it's the killstreaks that diminish the games competitive value, not the perks.

Oh damn, solid statement!

Why do you even care? Or do you just like to give Activision money for a game (and premium service) that they keep changing? I have no doubt that COD9 will be any different. And if you say that Trey Arch will make a difference think again because the COD franchisee is property of Activision.

neoreaper wrote:

 

No perks in BO's 2 is a possability. I for 1 would love this. Whats your opinions?

think you totally missed the point,

perks for pub ie everyday play but not for competetive play like mlg (something vahns really got an interest in)