With that mentality you might as well give everyone one gun and one set of perks.
The point of having so many guns is to give us variety. If one gun outclasses all others that gun should be looked at.
All guns are meant to perform within certain boundaries. When one gun transcends those boundaries it starts being looked at as "OP". The FMGs are secondary machine pistols, but they're often used as primaries and can outperform all SMGs even though they're not supposed to. FMGs can outperform ARs in some cases. They out class all shotguns. Hell, when one set of guns can take out a juggo in one clip there is definitely some balance issues. Not a single assault rifle can take out a juggo in one clip. There is no reason why a secondary should be stronger than the majority of primaries. If you can't see why the FMGs are "OP" there is something wrong with you.
No one should be forced to play one way simply because it's the best. I personally don't die to FMGs often because I keep my distance, but it's painfully obvious that they're way too good. The obvious counter to FMGs is a slower distanced playstyle, but if everyone adapted this then you'd be on here whining about how slow the game plays.
By the way, don't group all players together. I don't QS, hell I can't stand snipers in general. They hardly ever contribute to the team and I'm big on team work.
As for the T95 and Striker, I can see where people come from but I don't believe either of them are "OP". The Striker is "OP" within its class, but not when compared to the rest of the guns.
