BF3= Quality title

MW3= Cash cow

BF and COD are 2 completely different games. It's like comparing Mass effect to final fantasy because they are both RPG's.

Most people who go into Battlefield looking to play another COD usually end up hating it.

it's just a different type of game.  i like it myself.  if i play enough and get used to it, who knows, it might become my favorite.  there's a lot to learn, most of all...it need to learn how to compensate for bullet trajectories at long range.  it's a more realistic game, but that doesn't mean it's more fun.  if we're talking realism...then even a bullet in some appendage is gonna hurt and affect you.  so, not even bf3 is that real. 

@davidlsofferman: it's a cash cow for a reason.  bf's good in it's own way.   the mere fact that you're even trying to say one is better than the other without rhyme or reason says more about u than the games themselves.  they're both quality titles...completely different games though...and one is a cash cow for a reason.  please, stop making yourself look stupid with something that is essential a tweet, a burp, or demonstrating that you just have tourettes syndrome by just speaking your mind.  *****.

@kuronico: i have both series and have been playing them for a while.  i'm just partial to the cod series.  for me, the gameplay is just a bit faster.  i like it...doesn't mean i'm 12 years old like some people like to say to demean cod...i just like it more.  cod requires strategy and tactics...but, groups just have to formulate and excute them faster...like in real life

Alot of people are saying the 2 games are differnet, well i disagree, They are both shooters, they both employ some type of tactical thoughtprocess when playing. Both have nearly the same Online Mulitplayer game modes and alot of the same weapons. SO all that being yes they are a competing product like Mcdonalds and Burger King. Does BF do some things better im sure they do, does MW do things better then BF sure they do.. What it really boils down to i think is what the gamer is looking for.

I was a die hard BF BC1 fan, Loved the game still own it today, BC2 came out and it was ok not as good at BC1. BF3 came out after playing an early release (not alpha or beta) it was a real letdown, i had expected more or if nothing else to put things back that worked and stop trying to "improve" things that dont need it.

COD had a great game when MW was released, the mechanics were insane for the time, and the flow of the player/shooter was impressive for a game of this type. MW2 i do think improved on some things like the ranking system and perk systems but left the overall flow and multiplayer experience alone. BO was well BO and people either liked or hated it.. it did fill the void nicely. MW3 i truly hope they will leave the game mechanics alone and do what they havce done in the past which is improve the weapons ranking and perk systems. The rest is great leave it as it is.

If its not broke dont fix it..

All that being said this is a COD forum if you want to talk about BF go to thier forums LOL.

I really want to say BF3. 

I thought BF3 was ok, but I think I'll stick with MW3. Though I'm playing BF3 at the moment to see how many of the Trophies I can get.