This was pretty simple.....I don't believe any of the arguments anymore. I've played enough and see how it works. People who have the lower K/D doesn't mean a thing. K/D is an indvidually skewed number (will save you all the statistical jargon) that is there to build the beast.
Never seen any "beast" worried about team wins. The key word being the win. With all that being said, I just suggested an alternative mode to where you only get the "spoils of the war if you win". Your response and attack on people's "less than admirable abilties" measured by an individual achievement marker -K/D, only bolsters my argument that there should be all or nothing objective games. Maybe all of the people with K/D since that is the "true" measure of the player, /sarc/ should be seperated by people having a K/D higher than 1.25 be put with others higher than 1.25. Ohhh no can't do that, then people can't "strive" to get better says the elitists. Nooooo then the elitists won't have us underlings to kill on a regular basis to pad their beast K/D.
At 44 years old, I don't think I'll ever understand the "gamers." I mean look all over the boards on this forum. Seems like they are never happy.
Before I get trolled about not having to play the game, I have 60 reasons in addition a great deal of others why I can play this game and I have respectively posted on this open forum. Next November, whether I buy 60 more reasons to play another game or not, that remains to be seen.
I do have a funny question. How many of you beasts play HC on a regular basis? I mean I have seen posts on here from the elite declaring the Hard Core is for loosers because it's too easy. Does anyone else see the oxmoron here? I mean why don't they call Hard Core Soft Core and Core Hard Core?
And one more, what exactly is Core for?
