itribulationz wrote:

 

I'd say in this situation, there is a difference between hiding and camping. I get my Harriers and get to a safe spot to avoid any confrontation with enemy players. It isn't like I'm sitting in a dark corner waiting for them. I'm patiently awaiting my Harriers to get me whatever my next killstreak may be. If someone runs into me, their problem.

 

That is still straight up camping. Sitting in a corner somewhere is camping. Period. It doesn't matter if you happen to have a harrier up in the air or not. You are camping.

Yeah, one of the more satisfying parts of MW2 was shooting down someone's AC130. Coordinated efforts are the best.

I'm just applying to what I saw in MW2 when it came to stacking killstreaks.

I'd rather see players working for their pointstreaks than allowing their pointstreaks to do the work for them.

It's so easy to avoid and even easier to shoot down. Also players get a pointstreak for shooting down air support as well So that's going to encourage players even more to shoot it down

 

Depends on what teammates you get.

I'm playing in full teams from Day 1. I can't rely on randoms anymore even when I'm the only one taking down air support.

So if the final decision is stacking killstreak, then so be it but I can see lone-wolf players struggling depending on what teammates you get and how many of them equip a stinger or use the support package.

Not to the effect of Modern Warfare 2. Hopefully it will not be the same in Modern Warfare 3.

The way I see it using Modern Warfare 2 as an example.

No one should be allowed to obtain a minimum of four kills to vastly change the outcome of a game.

That isn't to say that those who attempted this were succesful everytime, but the road to an AC130 was quite easy. A killstreak that required THREE SAMs to take down. That's a game changer. Minimal effort should not result in maximum output.

That doesn't mean that it is gamebreaking, but it does come off as annoying. It also takes away from the "gun on gun" statement. Again, I'll have fun with it, but I don't appreciate the chaos.

@IIFOXHOUNDII

I think any type of air support will be taken down quite quickly because of the addition of point streaks. Let's say if I only need x amount of points for my next killstreak and the enemy just deployed there air support, I would try everything in my power to take it down so I can get my next killstreak (I think the points depand on what level killstreak is out). With point streaks, air support will be in the air for a lesser time then in previous COD's because everyone will be trying to take them down so they can get those extra points toward there next killstreak.