It wasn't needed in COD4, its not needed now. I don't understand the logic of ruining the sniper class with what is clearly an expolit of the aim system

atleast no-scopers kept it to private games, there was a few who went into public lobbies on COD4 but once they got owned by assault rifles they left, this quickscoping joke has to stop

Because Assault rifles are designed to shoot at long ranges, otherwise they wouldn;t of invented the ACOG Scope or fitted Telescopic scopes to AK-74's

You're here to "proof" me huh.  That video made me lol, you only have 2 kills with the sniper in it.   The rest are with secondaries/exposives and the enemy didn't shoot back for like any of them.  Your first kill the guy was almost dead, you shot him once with sidearm hipfire.  Your magnum play makes me weep also, it's my most used weapon =/.  I could go 7-3 hatchets only if the enemy team is bad enough, the fact that you think this video proves anything shows your stupidity.  "Hey I used a sniper for one match and got 2 kills with it lets post a video and use it as evidence that snipers are fine".  Yeah, good players can do well with snipers or shotguns or any shitty weapon if the other team sucks enough, I have a 3+kd using just snipers and the magnum mostly, but you can do a hell of a lot better with the famas/galil/47u, that's a fact.  How many snipers you see at mlg?  All I see is famas.

Hey ifrerkinbr4di when you gonna give me your gamertag so we can do your little challenge

AA is going to day since the game is already going to microsoft for testing and will be on the shelves in over a month.  So stop crying QSing so good that anyone can own a pro with a AR or SMG when it isn't.  Your job is to just start a flame war over QSing like it is the worst thing in CoD.