Dec 19, 2011 2:23 AM
Could the Pavelow get an extra flare?
-
Like (0)
I dont get why the AC130 (12 Killstreak) has 2 flares + 1 to be taken down while the pavelow only has 1. They take the same amount to kills/points to achieve so why is it that one has fewer flares? Just wondering due to my pavelows being insta destroyed.
Agree, give it some extra flares it's way to easy to take this killstreak down.
Agreed
Agreed
yh i agree because isnt the description of a pavelow 'a heavily armoued helicopter'?
Just wondering if you guys could help me keep this bumped so it gets noticed. Thanks.
I agree!
I imagine it may be their thinking that the Pavelow doesn't leave you unprotected like the AC130, and you can therefore gain additional gun kills?
It is me or does the regular Attack Heli not have a single flare ? Way too easy to take down.
Yep... I take down attack heli's beforeo they reach the map sometimes. It is not fair, but I am not going to stop doing it...
It should have at least 1 flare
As rlbl said - I take down stuff before it reaches the map 90% of the time...They should give everything at least 1 to 2 extra from what it has or doesn't have now.
yeah you think a basic helicopter would have at least 1 flare but i support the PL having 2 since its 12 points to obtain
AC130 > Pavelow - usually people don't even try to shoot it down.
tbh all you need is a SAM turret or a stealth class to prevent the Pl from accurately locking on to you.
Nope, I have two stinger rockets, and am happy it takes it out![]()
It doesn't matter if it has another flare because I'll just kill myself to get that extra shot in like I do for the AC-130 and osprey gunner. I take out attack choppers before they enter the map all the time. With blind eye one flare for the attack chopper isn't going to matter much. Its all part of the game. If you're going against a team that takes out air support the number of flares doesn't mean much. If you're playing against a team that doesn't shoot down air support then it doesn't matter how many flares it has either because they won't get used.
although im an ac-130 fanboy ^_^, i belive that the pavelow could get another flare, but you also have to notice something, if u come outside while a pavelow is in the air, ur pretty much dead before you can lock onto it.
also the ac130 seems a little weak. you cant spawn kill with the 105 round (which was epic in MW2), and theres way to many buildings in these maps.
anyway, the if the pavelow gets 2 flares, theres rly no reason to use the "angel of death" xD
Umm, no? The pavelow can already destroy if given enough time, it doesn't need to made even more powerful. Streaks are for HELPING only, not for getting free kills with.
The point of the streak is to help get kills but if a 12 killstreak can be taken out by one player in ONE life I don't see that as fair. If the guy has to kill himself in order to take it out thats fine.
Also what are the extra kills leading to? I only go to 12 as my highest streak so it is not even adding to my killstreak?
helicopters go down way too easy when compared to MW2 and BO. Helicopters are useless, although i have gotten more usage out of strafe runs than the attack helo and the pave low.
No
the pavelow is fine.....
it takes 2 stingers to take down..... unless your right under it, then the stinger can sometimes by pass the flares....
but it takes 2-3 javelins i believe and 3 saww's or whatever the first launcher is.....
its not gonna matter if the pavelow gets 1 more flare...look at the osprey gunner it gets taken down within seconds too..... espically with blind eye pro, it takes like 1 second to lock on...
and even myself....i'll fire 2 rockets, then kill myself (fall/semtex) then finish the job...to me its worth the death to get rid of support assult killstreaks...