Something along those lines would be effective. I think simple damage is preferable, especially for the Type 95 fans but rate of fire would assist as well as it would lower the connectivity of the bullets in a single burst and make the "aim" aspect more challenging for ensuring you get a kill.

Either way...

I will agree on this. It's like a death machine.

I don't come on the forums to complain either. I mean the Type 95 is a good gun, but it sometimes feels OP. I don't know how to explain it but that's how I feel about it.

It has potential, that's probably what you're feeling. In a hypothetical situation where everyone has instantaneous reflexes and perfect accuracy its results would be better than many other weapons, but you have to factor in human error.

Why are the automatics still very popular? Because any braindead moron can spray and get kills that they probably didn't work very hard to earn. Especially when very powerful and controllable automatics like the ACR are available the sheer ease of use becomes very, very appealing. Why would any sane individual take on the added liability of the gaps between bursts?

In this case, the extra damage is what makes it worthwhile. If the T95 wasn't able to get kills in only 2 hits then it would be worthless. Look at the M16 if you don't believe me. At the ranges where it supposedly has an edge, any automatic can get the same kill in the same span of time, and while completely avoiding the looming risk that you might need to wait before you have a chance to fire again.

Moral of this story- T95 may well be too strong, but at least you still have to aim it. I'd much rather have overpowered weapons that demand marksmanship than underpowered ones that don't. *cough* *cough* akimbos *cough*

Or in our case, overpowered ones that don't.