Skip navigation
1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 ... 38 Previous Next 198773 Views 375 Replies Latest reply: Jan 16, 2012 12:54 AM by sgtGanGreen RSS Go to original post
  • Newbie 49 posts since
    Nov 9, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    50. Nov 19, 2011 3:15 AM (in response to gallp13)
    Re: MW3 PATCH DETAILS

    yes in black ops we would get detailed info

     

    signed

     

     

    as far as i know the patch did not patch the button clan tags still see them all over the place, and the type 95 is still beast.

  • Calculating status... 1 posts since
    Sep 20, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    52. Nov 19, 2011 4:03 AM (in response to gallp13)
    Re: MW3 PATCH DETAILS

    Signed, I like the patch details, keeps you aware

  • dunnel009 Apprentice 812 posts since
    Sep 2, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    53. Nov 19, 2011 4:06 AM (in response to gallp13)
    Re: MW3 PATCH DETAILS

    i could be wrong but i think the patch was for elite..

    A tweet from ACTIMikey on thursday said they were working on elite and had started patch testing and would work on other stuff then...

    I'll see if i can find the tweet and post up what he said exactly

  • Calculating status... 2 posts since
    Nov 19, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    54. Nov 19, 2011 4:08 AM (in response to gallp13)
    Re: MW3 PATCH DETAILS

    +1

     

    I can tell you what wasn`t included in the patch, a fix for the Server Connection Timed Out crashes.

     

    Played 5 games with the new update and only 1 was completed.

  • Newbie 25 posts since
    Nov 12, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    55. Nov 19, 2011 4:11 AM (in response to gallp13)
    Re: MW3 PATCH DETAILS

    pc however signed

     

    +1!

  • smokestormx Calculating status... 2 posts since
    Jul 18, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    56. Nov 19, 2011 4:13 AM (in response to gallp13)
    Re: MW3 PATCH DETAILS

    Still no official patch notes in the main forums, come on , that is a MUST!

  • Calculating status... 2 posts since
    Oct 24, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    57. Nov 19, 2011 5:30 AM (in response to gallp13)
    Re: MW3 PATCH DETAILS

    signed

  • xMRxNemo Novice 227 posts since
    Nov 18, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    58. Nov 19, 2011 5:33 AM (in response to gallp13)
    Re: MW3 PATCH DETAILS

    four zero two should be fired

  • maccabi Master 11,874 posts since
    May 31, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    59. Nov 19, 2011 5:37 AM (in response to gallp13)
    Re: MW3 PATCH DETAILS

    while I agree changelogs are needed I think there are two very good reasons why they are not being posted at present.

     

    The first is some hotfixes ect dont actually effect the game are are more backend stuff and

    secondly the main reason is feedback.

     

    If they hotfix/patch something that effects the game and/or deals with a complaint alot of people have by not posting changelogs the feedback they get is unbiased and gives a much more accurate gauge to see if what they did had an effect.

     

    it eliminates the placebo effect , by that i mean if for example they have said oh we patched the lag alot of people would post yeah its alot better just because they think it should be..

     

    whereas a better indication would be to say nothing and wait for the hmmm is it me or is the lag suddenly better/worse comments to start piling in.

     

    *disclaimer this is my own personal opinion based on when i used to be in the game industry and also didnt post changelogs (ok sometimes i was just plain lazy)

1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 ... 38 Previous Next

Actions

Bookmarked By (0)