He may be, it's $60.  I respect his opinion, ain't nothing wrong with feeling like that.  I'm just glad I like it lol. <3

@ Merkat although I agree with what you say but is it TWO years worth of development?

Although it appears (i say appears as I have not played it yet even though i had it at 12:03 this morning watched my lad play 5 games and not been back on since ) to run nice and smooth there isn`t a lot different from MW2, almost all the objects are from MW2 most of the sounds are also.

Just comes accross as a lazy way of making money from us all.

At least Treyarch made a clear effort (although it needed tweaking) it was clear thay had moved the game forward.

If you bring it back within i believe 10 days you get a full refund?  So ill take $64.98

Wish people would realize that MW3 was not in development for 2 years...if any of you remember activision had a lawsuit against the 2 main guys from IW. When that happen all patches for MW2 had to be stopped cause they could not touch the game during the lawsuit and all developpement of MW3 was put on hold, and you all know when it ended cause they released a nice patch on MW1,2 that got rid of the retard hackers, and they continued making MW3. and that lawsuit was something like 6-9months. Thats alot of developpement time taken away right now. So please next time you say they took the lazy way out, do your research on anything that delays them making it. Now they coulda just released it in Jan-march of 2012 to finish up more but im quite happy with the game as it is. Well until retards ruin it with quick scoping and the ump is again op...wont ever  change, even in BF3 is op as hell.

Edit: i fixed 1012 to 2012, mistyped a number.