Lets see. Breakable glass. Full maps. Awesome weapon sound, real gold camo. good killstreaks. All of the weapons and attachments. Graphics are a bit eh, and we are missing the Recon Drone, Osprey Gunner, AC130, Reaper Drone, and Predator Missile, but still awesome. BTW, MOAB IS IN!
Yeah I agree it looks good but I`m just wondering if the multiplayer experience will have a lasting appeal or if I`ll get bored of it like modern warfare reflex...
I think I've said this before, but I really believe with enough work put into it, the Wii versions of CoD could be a lot better than what they are now. I still believe Nintendo would of been best suited for handling the port.
For all the idiots who think I'm crazy, I'm not. Nintendo handling the port would in no way change the game (shooting bananas instead of bullets and some idiot said once before). Nintendo made their console, there's no one better at programming for the Wii than them. They're able to push nice graphics and keep it 60 frames per second in all of their games.
Anyway so far to me it looks like the M4A1 has a slower firerate than the 360 version.
The Lag issues & Hit Detection issues will get better. BE PATIENT. The game's been available to me personally for 9 hours now & I don't have it yet but am picking it up in a few hours. I remember Black Ops adding upgrades every few days at 1st. Just play through the campaign & get comfortable with new controls & options for a few days if it's such a big deal right now. Or Adjust, Adapt, & Overcome. Use grenades, grenade launchers, full auto weapongs, etc. but just don't COMPLAIN! It will get better.
If you know whats involved with porting a game then you wouldn't be loling. If Nintendo were to handle the port, they wouldn't be able to make their own decisions in any major part of the game (eg, not include knifing because its violent or something)
or if I`ll get bored of it like modern warfare reflex...
