Jun 24, 2011 4:35 AM
Lets be honest TrayArch.
-
Like (0)
Dudeacus97 wrote:
IW being overpowed and non-blanced?
CoD 4 had awesome balance.
Kainon wrote:
Dudeacus97 wrote:
IW being overpowed and non-blanced?
CoD 4 had awesome balance.
COD 4 - Modern Warfare has NOTHING to do with Treyarch.
I Love WWII era, and would go back to W@W if I knew they patched it.
Dudeacus97 wrote:
IW being overpowed and non-blanced?
CoD 4 had awesome balance. Each gun had its advantages and disadvantages.
Example:
AK47 has aweome damage but it's recoil is ****
M4 Carbine doesn't believe in recoil but it's damage is ****
The only OP stuff in MW2 were:
-UMP45 (if you use it, you're officially gay)
-Quickscoping (its called a sniper rifle, not a run-around-like-an-idiot-on-coke rifle)
-Noob Toobs w/ DC & OMA (if you use them, you're gayer than all of the Silenced UMPS in the world)
C_L_O_U_D_M_A_N wrote:
I'd rather not go into this realm of debate, but I really don't think BF3 is going to be the death of MW3 or the CoD franchise in general.
But other than that I am completely in agreeance with you (I love how you worded that first paragraph by the way!). Also - not that I don't believe you - but where did the WAW player count figure come from?
According to that bald twit Robert Bowling of Infinity Ward, a security patch is on the horizon for COD4. I'm hoping this was instigated by Activision rather than IW, as it might mean they're getting onto Treyarch about WAW's problems too.
I'd love to see the three map packs offered for compensation seeing as they hardly ever come up these days with all the new accounts playing (or maybe a few months of Double XP), but at this stage I'd be more than satisfied with just one damn patch to fix my goddamn game.
majnu wrote:
People have been complaining for a good year about this. Treyarch simply don't give a fcuk.
As we gamers, fans, paying players of WAW are constantly being ignored what I suggest is that we use all the threads as evidence of Treyarch's and Activision's non commitment to fix this game and write letters to all credible online YouTube commentators (Cynical Brit) and get him to give his opinion on the MailBox, companies like Kotaku, Games Industry, etc.
We can start a standard letter which simply highlights the problem and it does not need to be very complicated.
Dudeacus97 wrote:
IW being overpowed and non-blanced?
CoD 4 had awesome balance. Each gun had its advantages and disadvantages.
Example:
AK47 has aweome damage but it's recoil is ****
M4 Carbine doesn't believe in recoil but it's damage is ****
The only OP stuff in MW2 were:
-UMP45 (if you use it, you're officially gay)
-Quickscoping (its called a sniper rifle, not a run-around-like-an-idiot-on-coke rifle)
-Noob Toobs w/ DC & OMA (if you use them, you're gayer than all of the Silenced UMPS in the world)
I don't agree with drug dealers very often but this is one exception. True. MW2 and Black Ops will one day die the same way as WaW. But TreyArch has one problem on their hands. Look at what Microsoft did when it stopped supporting Windows XP. Microsoft pulled every copy from the shelves of every store that sold software. Every online store that sold XP. GLOBALLY. If you look in XBox Live market place you will see TreyArch still making money from WaW sales. They can't abandon the game and turn profits from sales at the same time. Legal department needs to look at this situation. Maybe we have a little leverage after all. And this situation does make me think differently about buying the next latest/greatest game from TreyArch. Will my purchase be as short lived at it was with WaW? May influence me away from the cash register.drug dealer wrote:
They are destroying their legacy by letting w@w die. In 20 years people aren't going to remember the 1-2 hack free years they had. They're going to remember all the years of unplayable-ness after that.. I'm certain they will abandon Black Ops when their next title comes, and I think that will keep people away from their games in the future.