o m g


why is there only american forces in mp for friendly forces (that we know of)

imo, there should be british, and french forces too.


tryarch patriotism strikes again.

british duringb the cold war where key.

we had nukes in germany(incase they invaded them), and around mosco and other major citys around  just incase anythink kicked of.

and french where in naaam man.


THIS WHAT INFINITY WARD GOT RIGHT. DIFFRENT CULTURES.

the SAS when it to nam(bread) under amrican and french forces, but commanded them selves.

the shear ignorance of other forces during the cold war and viat nam out stands me.


WHY IS THERE ONLY AMERICAN FRIENDLY FOURCES, WHEN NON-FRIENDLYS GET 3 DIFFRENT ONES?


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~links for the diubters that need to know history~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

SAS(n other fources in vietnam)
http://www.vietnamwar.govt.nz/memory/sas-reconnaissance-interview-with-george-b abbington

http://www.britains-smallwars.com/Vietnam/SP.htm -- common wealth sf

http://www.allenandunwin.com/default.aspx?page=94&book=9781865086477 (book(with blerb()


britain and cold war:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_War (cnt+f brit)

http://www.britishcoldwarveterans.co.uk/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/8039493/Britain-is-s till-fighting-the-cold-war-and-is-unprepared-for-a-Mumbai-style-attack.html



want any more proof?

_______________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________
they should atleast put common wealth special fources in (CWSF) cover auasies n newzealand