1
...
49
50
51
52
53
54
Previous
Next
24707 Views
539 Replies
Latest reply:
Mar 15, 2012 7:22 PM by
rpatto92
Go to original post
-
Currently Being ModeratedRe: Perks, min. number requirement?
bartimaeus1 wrote:
Stopping power is a totally unrealistic perk that adds nothing to the experience
Okay that was just silly :P- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Currently Being ModeratedRe: Perks, min. number requirement?i think keep the similar amount, no need to unneccesarily remove perks just to lower the amount, no need to add pontless perks just to increase.
But some new perks would be nice- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Currently Being ModeratedRe: Perks, min. number requirement?I like the perks like bomb squad (Sit-rep) and all but I dislike juggernaut, cold blooded, stopping power, Commando, last stand, One man army, Danger close. I will break it down like this:
Cold Blooded
In call of duty four there was UAV Jammer and I liked it a lot. Cold blooded is the next level you get to dodge all of the air support too? No thank you!
Stopping Power
It gives an unfair advantage to guns and it gives you more damage? But then you have guns even though they me balanced that may well if given stopping power will get out of hand.
Juggernaut
Simply over-powered the health boost is too high I keep trying to kill a guy with pain killer or juggernaut and I end up dieing it's as simple as that.
Commando
Simple; I shoot at a person they "teleport" to me and knife me. No thanks!
Last-Stand
As I said before I may be shooting at a person I might not see the drop but they are on the ground and they get me. It's as simple as that common stuff that can just make a person rage-quit
One man army
Switching classes in the middle of a game.. In mw2 commonly used with danger close to reap havoc with the grenade launchers.
Danger Close
It powers up explosives and is similar to sonic boom. If you use sonic boom in cod4 you can get the same damage as a mw2 grenade launcher. But moving on with this perk commonly used with One man army again people reap havoc with grenade launchers.
But onwards to the count It doesn't matter don't force yourself or an overpowered perk like one of the above or worst(if that's possible) may be produced!- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Currently Being ModeratedRe: Perks, min. number requirement?go back to cod4 style but simpler classes and more focus on the actual gameplay. this is where mw2 went wrong.
- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Currently Being ModeratedRe: Perks, min. number requirement?Overkill, ninja pro, double tap, and bomb squad as a first perk would be appreciated.
- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Currently Being ModeratedRe: Perks, min. number requirement?Just take Stoping power out.
- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Currently Being ModeratedRe: Perks, min. number requirement?if they do take out stopping power at least give the guns decent damage i dont want to shoot at a guy with a sniper to the chest and get a hitmarker. I dont want it like halo where you need a clip and a half to kill some one

- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Currently Being ModeratedRe: Perks, min. number requirement?MW2 perks that I like
- sleight of hand
- scavenger
- bling
- stopping power
- hardline
- cold blooded
- steady aim
- ninja
- sitrep- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Currently Being ModeratedRe: Perks, min. number requirement?Perks to keep:
* Bling
[This one's good]
* Cold-Blooded
[Better than Camouflage]
* Iron Lungs
[Replace Steady Aim, no one uses or even needs hip-fire accuracy]
* Last Stand
[Not too cheap like Second chance]
* Lightweight
[This one's good]
* Marathon
[This one's good]
* Ninja
[Awesome Perk. Beats Dead Silence]
* Scavenger
[Different Pro version? Extra Mags suck if you have regular already]
* Scrambler
[For those who want to use it. Maybe scramble things like thermal?]
* Sleight of Hand
[The faster aiming is too much of an advantage though *Pro version]
* Stopping Power
[Please no Juggernaut, it's hard to kill enemies as it is]
* Toss Back
[Very useful Perk, the throwback technique just kills or hurts you]- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Currently Being ModeratedRe: Perks, min. number requirement?
SNE4K1000 wrote:
i think keep the similar amount, no need to unneccesarily remove perks just to lower the amount, no need to add pontless perks just to increase.
But some new perks would be nice
^^^^^^what he said^^^^- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)