Community: Message List - For everyone saying Black Ops II is too farfetched.

Re: For everyone saying Black Ops II is too farfetched.

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 03 May 2012 20:37:47 GMT

Everyone here that does not think this is possible is retarded... Everyone here that is talking about the US being in a deficit and not being able to spend money on this is retarded... The US has been in a deficit for a while and the one thing that they will never stop spending on is to keep us safe, the president has a black list in which he can spend as much as he wants in it and it is never made public... The spending on defense in this country is where the US spends the most money, it will not stop because we are in a deficit at all... Technology does not grow in linear progession it grows exponentially, it snow balls... There is a heat wave gun that the US has now, the US has made a rail gun to fire a massive bullet 2000 miles in 2 hours on target, this stuff is real people... At the beginning of the war in afghanistan there was not a single computer driven drone and now there are over 7,000. You guys are really that ignorant that you do not believe we can progress this far in another 13 years? It is possible and it will happen because the US will always spend money if they believe development in this area will defend us no matter how much in a deficit we are in!!!

Re: For everyone saying Black Ops II is too farfetched.

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 03 May 2012 18:17:23 GMT

Something we all need to remember is ITS A GAME!! For what its worth we could end up riding Bif the magical clownfish... because its a game. So if they want to depict th US having a mechanized army let em do it it will still be fun.

Re: For everyone saying Black Ops II is too farfetched.

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 03 May 2012 18:01:09 GMT

See! I knew it wasn't farfetched I also watched something on the History channel a few years ago about a prottype cout vehicle that is armed with a light machine gun. It is perfectly possible that they can have a light srmored vehichle that is similar toa BTr or something of the sort. Kuudos to you my friend!

Re: For everyone saying Black Ops II is too farfetched.

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 03 May 2012 16:15:47 GMT

I will say one thing about the preview that everyone (may have) missed....

The VIDEO takes place in 2025 and he is remembering the battles. He was talking about the PAST. So the technology would be taking place at around this year or before this year.

So NOW how farfetched is it ?

Re: For everyone saying Black Ops II is too farfetched.

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 03 May 2012 07:15:25 GMT

For all you losers who are saying We wont have this technology in 13 years, we already have the technology, technology is doubling by the year this explains it all..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gm5PZGb3OyQ&feature=relmfu

Re: For everyone saying Black Ops II is too farfetched.

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 03 May 2012 06:25:03 GMT

starbuckfrack wrote:

coolwhhhip wrote:

Trolls shall troll. But they don't have the numbers. Normal people still rule the day.
Havent seen you post in a while "Stewie"

It seems I go through phases. I think Im getting pretty excited about cod again with BO2. First time I felt good about it since MW2.

Re: For everyone saying Black Ops II is too farfetched.

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 03 May 2012 06:17:51 GMT

coolwhhhip wrote:

Trolls shall troll. But they don't have the numbers. Normal people still rule the day.

Havent seen you post in a while "Stewie"

Re: For everyone saying Black Ops II is too farfetched.

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 03 May 2012 06:11:47 GMT

starbuckfrack wrote:

I bet codfirearms is still not understanding the concept of a video game

I am surprised he isnt complaining about how farfetched it is that you can come back to life with full ammo and full health many times in a COD game.

Or how farfetched it is that you can get instant air support when called.

Or how farfetched it is that when you get shot in multiplayer that you dont just bleed out instead of die outright.

Etc. Etc.

The game is still 6 months away and people are complaining about the game, complaining about the timeframe, complaining about the weapons, complaining about how unrealistic the game is.

Cant wait until they announce the weapons and the perks in the game. then the forum will be in full swing with complaints galore.

Trolls shall troll. But they don't have the numbers. Normal people still rule the day.

Re: For everyone saying Black Ops II is too farfetched.

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 03 May 2012 05:50:59 GMT

I bet codfirearms is still not understanding the concept of a video game

I am surprised he isnt complaining about how farfetched it is that you can come back to life with full ammo and full health many times in a COD game.

Or how farfetched it is that you can get instant air support when called.

Or how farfetched it is that when you get shot in multiplayer that you dont just bleed out instead of die outright.

Etc. Etc.

The game is still 6 months away and people are complaining about the game, complaining about the timeframe, complaining about the weapons, complaining about how unrealistic the game is.

Cant wait until they announce the weapons and the perks in the game. then the forum will be in full swing with complaints galore.

Re: For everyone saying Black Ops II is too farfetched.

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 03 May 2012 04:35:29 GMT

coltfirearms wrote:

coolwhhhip wrote:

coltfirearms wrote:

th3_im0rtal wrote:

Fine, I say yes. Why? At the rate that technology is advancing these days, I can see a few WTs in the futrue. Will it replace the Abrams entierly? No. Happy now? Can we end this squabble now?
LOL if you truley think so. I guess that is your opinion. But I think you are saying it just to be right. But I am very pleased that you stood up and said what you wanted to say.

What do you mean by advancing these days? What on the major size scale has advanced that much since the year 2000 militarily (I said year 2000 because that was 12 years ago which is close to 13. We have been running the same the majority of the same equipment since then. I don't see why end the discussion. Isn't the whole point of this community is to discuss Call of Duty? I mean the F35 lighitng has been in production stages for a while. The F22 still has not seen combat. I feel like to develop a walking tank would take more then 13 years. Just my 2 cents
Going into Iraq and Afganistan we didn't use UAVs. We now have over 7000. This was something I knew about, common knowledge really, but they do mention this very thing in the BO2 release documentary. Check it out and get with the times. It isn't just propaganda they are using to justify the future setting. Regardless, splitting hairs over technicalities for the accuracy of the setting is mind numbingly dumb to me. The stuff really isn't that far fetched, but I could care less even if they do exagerate the truth. It's still going to be cod and will still be fun. Sorry to bust anyone's bubble but cod is not a simulator. If that is a big deal for you, I understand MOH Warfighter will be sticking to accuaracy as much as possible, so that might be something to check out. Although, they are going to allow all of the Special Operators in the world to fight each other in multiplayer (good guys vs so called good guys) so maybe that one jumped the shark too. Geez, trolls settle down and enjoy the game. I can't wait and have full faith that it's gonna be a great game.

PS: Here is the link for the little documentary if you want to get a better idea for where they are coming from. Kinda annoying though that folks don't just kinda "get" it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P45Yn3mYhec&feature=youtu.be&a
Who on earth are you calling a troll? Your definition of a troll is really off buddy. I have been part of the COD community for a long time. Also I am not saying it has to be the most realistic game in the world. I have already said this 100 freakin times. For ME Call of Duty has been about putting the player in the shoes of a soldier/marine/seaman or whatever in a relativley reality based setting. Wether it being historical, modern, or futursitc. This is too far fetched to fall into that catigory. They could make this game in the year 2100 or 2200 or something I don't care. But in a realistic setting 13 years from now the United States won't have a mechanized drone army or walking tanks. Also you need to get your facts straight the US has been using UAVs since way before Afghanistan. That is just my 2 cents. That does not make me a troll. Just because I don't agree with everything in the game does not make me a troll.

Sorry, you may have contributed plenty of good content to the forums, but it does strike me as a little trollish to split hairs over this. It seems impossible to me that someone couldn't "get" what's going on here with the game, and so if it's impossible to not "get" it then the next conclusion really has to be that folks are just trolling. And you are by no means the only one Im accusing of this. That was a one size fits all card pulling. On the UAV deal, you wanted a major military advancement, and I do think it's safe to say that the mobilizing of UAVs onto the battlefield in the past decade has been a pretty big deal and one in which the majority of that growth and implementation did actually occur in the decade. We know they HAD drones, but what we have seen in the practice and advancment has been absolutely HUGE in the past decade. Just something simple thrown in for argument's sake. These guy's by the way aren't just some half assed game studio and they have a huge budget for research and everything else so I think we would be suprised with how accurate the predictions for the 2025 setting could be.

Re: For everyone saying Black Ops II is too farfetched.

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 03 May 2012 04:13:21 GMT

coolwhhhip wrote:

coltfirearms wrote:

th3_im0rtal wrote:

Fine, I say yes. Why? At the rate that technology is advancing these days, I can see a few WTs in the futrue. Will it replace the Abrams entierly? No. Happy now? Can we end this squabble now?
LOL if you truley think so. I guess that is your opinion. But I think you are saying it just to be right. But I am very pleased that you stood up and said what you wanted to say.

What do you mean by advancing these days? What on the major size scale has advanced that much since the year 2000 militarily (I said year 2000 because that was 12 years ago which is close to 13. We have been running the same the majority of the same equipment since then. I don't see why end the discussion. Isn't the whole point of this community is to discuss Call of Duty? I mean the F35 lighitng has been in production stages for a while. The F22 still has not seen combat. I feel like to develop a walking tank would take more then 13 years. Just my 2 cents
Going into Iraq and Afganistan we didn't use UAVs. We now have over 7000. This was something I knew about, common knowledge really, but they do mention this very thing in the BO2 release documentary. Check it out and get with the times. It isn't just propaganda they are using to justify the future setting. Regardless, splitting hairs over technicalities for the accuracy of the setting is mind numbingly dumb to me. The stuff really isn't that far fetched, but I could care less even if they do exagerate the truth. It's still going to be cod and will still be fun. Sorry to bust anyone's bubble but cod is not a simulator. If that is a big deal for you, I understand MOH Warfighter will be sticking to accuaracy as much as possible, so that might be something to check out. Although, they are going to allow all of the Special Operators in the world to fight each other in multiplayer (good guys vs so called good guys) so maybe that one jumped the shark too. Geez, trolls settle down and enjoy the game. I can't wait and have full faith that it's gonna be a great game.

PS: Here is the link for the little documentary if you want to get a better idea for where they are coming from. Kinda annoying though that folks don't just kinda "get" it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P45Yn3mYhec&feature=youtu.be&a

Who on earth are you calling a troll? Your definition of a troll is really off buddy. I have been part of the Call of Duty community for a long time. Also I am not saying it has to be the most realistic game in the world. I have already said this 100 freakin times. For ME Call of Duty has been about putting the player in the shoes of a soldier/marine/seaman or whatever in a relativley reality based setting. Wether it being historical, modern, or futursitc. This is too far fetched to fall into that catigory. They could make this game in the year 2100 or 2200 or something I don't care. But in a realistic setting 13 years from now the United States won't have a mechanized drone army or walking tanks. Also you need to get your facts straight the US has been using UAVs since way before Afghanistan. That is just my 2 cents. That does not make me a troll. Just because I don't agree with everything in the game does not make me a troll.

Re: For everyone saying Black Ops II is too farfetched.

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 03 May 2012 04:04:57 GMT

coltfirearms wrote:

th3_im0rtal wrote:

Fine, I say yes. Why? At the rate that technology is advancing these days, I can see a few WTs in the futrue. Will it replace the Abrams entierly? No. Happy now? Can we end this squabble now?
LOL if you truley think so. I guess that is your opinion. But I think you are saying it just to be right. But I am very pleased that you stood up and said what you wanted to say.

What do you mean by advancing these days? What on the major size scale has advanced that much since the year 2000 militarily (I said year 2000 because that was 12 years ago which is close to 13. We have been running the same the majority of the same equipment since then. I don't see why end the discussion. Isn't the whole point of this community is to discuss Call of Duty? I mean the F35 lighitng has been in production stages for a while. The F22 still has not seen combat. I feel like to develop a walking tank would take more then 13 years. Just my 2 cents

Going into Iraq and Afganistan we didn't use UAVs. We now have over 7000 and use them thoroughly. So there you go, a major military advancement that occured in the last 10 years. This was something we knew about, common knowledge really, but they do mention this very thing in the BO2 release documentary. Check it out and get with the times. It isn't just propaganda they are using to justify the future setting. Regardless, splitting hairs over technicalities for the accuracy of the setting is mind numbingly dumb to me. The stuff really isn't that far fetched, but I could care less even if they do exagerate the truth. It's still going to be cod and will still be fun. Sorry to bust anyone's bubble but cod is not a simulator. If that is a big deal for you, I understand MOH Warfighter will be sticking to accuaracy as much as possible, so that might be something to check out. Although, they are going to allow all of the Special Operators in the world to fight each other in multiplayer (good guys vs so called good guys) so maybe that one jumped the shark too. Geez, trolls settle down and enjoy the game. I can't wait and have full faith that it's gonna be a great game.

PS: Here is the link for the little documentary if you want to get a better idea for where they are coming from. Kinda annoying though that folks don't just kinda "get" it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P45Yn3mYhec&feature=youtu.be&a

Re: For everyone saying Black Ops II is too farfetched.

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 03 May 2012 03:52:40 GMT

From what i gathered there is going to be a cold war with China, which means there will be an arms race. Look at the immense amounts the US and the USSR pumped into their militaries during the last cold war. It is certainly possibly that the US face with a cold war with China could produce what is seen in the trailer.

15 years after the conclusion of WWII the first human entered space, that would have been considered impoossible to achieve during the WWII era.

'The future is not as far off as most people think...we're not ready for it."

Re: For everyone saying Black Ops II is too farfetched.

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 03 May 2012 03:41:52 GMT

LOL, callng people kids but has to resort to insults. Ok, kid. Believe what you want.

callofduty_capers wrote:

Dude, don't call me an idiot. Obvious mechanical legs exist, but in 13 years time we ill not have tanks that walk. Use your head dude. I didn't insult you so don't go around throwing insults. If you want to play like that it can get ugly real fast. In 13 years the US will more than likely not have an automated mechanized army. Also they will more than likely not have walking tanks. How hard is that to understand.

Re: For everyone saying Black Ops II is too farfetched.

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 03 May 2012 03:40:56 GMT

I feel like I have to stand up and say something about the far fetchedness (probably not a word) of the game. I mean everyone has their own opinions on it. I just want to dig deeper into people's justification for walking tanks in 13 years and an automated drone mech doo dad army. I feel like the idea of someone taking over a mech army could be interesting in a different sort of game. Why can't Activison brand it someting else? They kept the Call of Duty name to use it for sales like the money grabbing whores they are. Damn, I should never offened the higher ups. I might get banned lolz.

Re: For everyone saying Black Ops II is too farfetched.

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 03 May 2012 03:34:55 GMT

Simply the amount of interest this post has received is crazy.

Re: For everyone saying Black Ops II is too farfetched.

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 03 May 2012 03:30:10 GMT

BruisedBananas wrote:

1863

Do you believe in 13 years we will be able to talk to people from far away as if we were standing next to eachother?

13 years later, the first working telephone was developed

1872

Do you believe that in 13 years we will drive carts without horses or steam, but with an actual motor fueled by gas?

13 years later, the first four wheeled gas powered car.

1982

Do you believe we will ever use an unmanned airplane in battle?

13 years later, the first modern UAV was deployed in battle.

do I believe there will be walking variants of tanks in 13 years, hard to say, but I say yes, there will be a form of walking tanks, hell, maybe even unmanned. Whether or not it would be actually used in war? I don't know.

1st response: Yes because we had telegrams and that would be a potential advancement

2nd response: Yes because combustion engine vehicles already existed and were on vehicles so it would make sense they would be on a car eventually.

3rd Response: Yes because they existed before 1995.

If you asked me right if we will have something like phones that can run circles around a powerfull computer right now in 13 years I would say yes that is a possibility.

Those things all had an applicable reason for coming into existence. A tank for the US that walks on legs doesn't really have an applicable existence currently. I am sure people have been thinking about walking tanks for a long time, but is it reasonable to have one? I think that is the question. Of course if the US were to put its resources together they can have someone make them something similar to a walking tank in 13 years time. Do I think that in 13 years time something like that will be close to a battlefield? No. Is it reasonable to make one? Would they do it? Would you do it if you had to make that call? Spend money on something useless that probably won't be better then what you already have on treads?

Re: For everyone saying Black Ops II is too farfetched.

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 03 May 2012 03:17:48 GMT

It is almost certain we will see similar technology seen in science fiction such as Deus Ex, star trek, total recall, Black ops 2 and all the rest. However 2025, by my judgement, is too early for what is shown in the trailer.

2040 or 2050 earliest.

Although this is just my guess, im not an expert, although robots have been in production for many years, the japanese have been leading that innovation, who knows what the world will be like in 13 years. Hopefully we wont be at war though. I say if politicians want to war THEY should be on the battlefield. Or wars should just be fought over the internet, in virtual reality arenas or strategy games. lol. and the public can watch and bet! ha ha. will never happen, someone will lose and just say **** it im not having this and get the real bombs out. Too many psychopaths in this world.

Re: For everyone saying Black Ops II is too farfetched.

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 03 May 2012 03:08:28 GMT

1863

Do you believe in 13 years we will be able to talk to people from far away as if we were standing next to eachother?

13 years later, the first working telephone was developed

1872

Do you believe that in 13 years we will drive carts without horses or steam, but with an actual motor fueled by gas?

13 years later, the first four wheeled gas powered car.

1982

Do you believe we will ever use an unmanned airplane in battle?

13 years later, the first modern UAV was deployed in battle.

do I believe there will be walking variants of tanks in 13 years, hard to say, but I say yes, there will be a form of walking tanks, hell, maybe even unmanned. Whether or not it would be actually used in war? I don't know.

Re: For everyone saying Black Ops II is too farfetched.

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 03 May 2012 02:55:55 GMT

th3_im0rtal wrote:

Fine, I say yes. Why? At the rate that technology is advancing these days, I can see a few WTs in the futrue. Will it replace the Abrams entierly? No. Happy now? Can we end this squabble now?

LOL if you truley think so. I guess that is your opinion. But I think you are saying it just to be right. But I am very pleased that you stood up and said what you wanted to say.

What do you mean by advancing these days? What on the major size scale has advanced that much since the year 2000 militarily (I said year 2000 because that was 12 years ago which is close to 13. We have been running the same the majority of the same equipment since then. I don't see why end the discussion. Isn't the whole point of this community is to discuss Call of Duty? I mean the F35 lighitng has been in production stages for a while. The F22 still has not seen combat. I feel like to develop a walking tank would take more then 13 years. Just my 2 cents