Community: Message List - WHY QUICKSCOPING DOESN'T NEED TO BE IN COD.

Re: WHY QUICKSCOPING DOESN'T NEED TO BE IN COD.

donotreply@activision.com — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:39:25 GMT

QS will never be removed from this game series. Becasue a very large portion of the gamers that buy the game like to do it or try it because of how YT made it popular to do. Plus all those QS montages give the game free advertising and draw players to the game trying to emulate what they saw sp they can be cool and liked too.

So no matter what reasons a person likes it or does not like it, nor what evidence is given for or against it. It will not ever be completely removed from the CoD series ever. No company would ever remove a feature that generates revenue no matter how much the players cry about it. They would be foolish to ever do so since those players would just move to the game that let them play in that style. IW/Activision are companies first and foremost and out to make as much money as they can off or each game made and sold. And they are not foolish enough to remove a cash cow from the game just because some players do not like it.

Re: WHY QUICKSCOPING DOESN'T NEEDS TO BE IN COD.

donotreply@activision.com — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:05:33 GMT

xD Didnt qs and got dogs like 100 times xD u suck mr.Noob

Re: WHY QUICKSCOPING DOESN'T NEED TO BE IN COD.

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:24:39 GMT

I get more hitmarkers in this game than in blops. With impact on top. Funny that. Also these maps don't favor qsing. No real point in crying about getting qsed when holding on of these autos in your hands. I see qsers rage constantly while I dropshot beastmode them with the pp90 cqb. Try it.

IW / SH is the one who made getting hits with all guns very easy, Snipers are just competitive too in that aspect.

Shotguns indeed need a buff, though they at least now are better than they were on launch day.

Re: WHY QUICKSCOPING DOESN'T NEED TO BE IN COD.

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:15:13 GMT

As far as I am concerned there is only one reason QS-ing needs to be removed:

Snipers are better at point blank range than shotguns. Something about this is SERIOUSLY ****** up. I'm not against QS-ing but it should really be more like cod4, because as is the hit detection is WAY too forgiving for sniper rifles.

Re: WHY QUICKSCOPING DOESN'T NEED TO BE IN COD.

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:11:43 GMT

Wow, you're trash.

Yeah, QSing isnt needed in a fast paced FPS because you can camp like a little ***** and take the fun out of the game.

Awesome proof.

Tell me this is a troll post mocking the retarded anti-QS people?

Re: WHY QUICKSCOPING DOESN'T NEED TO BE IN COD.

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:33:02 GMT

Damn so sick of seeing all these little Black ops **** coming from there trying to get sniping all lame again grow up and man up play the game and get better with a AR or SMG cause if your complaining about snipers you got to be doing something wrong so get good or go back to black ops plain and simple thats your fix go back to black ops.

Re: WHY QUICKSCOPING DOESN'T NEEDS TO BE IN COD.

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:04:02 GMT

Well said man, sniper is not overpowered but exploiting the SKILLESS, yeah u heard me, SKILLESS quickscope is a huge problem that needs to be dealt with.

Activision, do something about it and either make it WAY harder to quickscope or simply patch it completely. People will stop playing the game if this goes on, a lot of people will stop playing it, period.

At the moment, quickscope requires almost NO skill and with the aim assist, it is a huge EXPLOIT. PATCH IT!

WHY QUICKSCOPING DOESN'T NEEDS TO BE IN COD.

donotreply@activision.com — Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:23:25 GMT

some little kid gets quick scoped when using a famas...

WHY QUICKSCOPING DOESN'T NEED TO BE IN COD.

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 19 Oct 2011 23:52:46 GMT

I understand that there are alot of people behind the quickscoping playstyle, and that there are alot of people against it aswell. Quickscoping is slightly unrealistic, but so is the ability to fire most SMG's at long range. Black ops almost completely ruined sniping entirely though, and I believe that quickscoping has earned its rightful return. You need to take into account more than just the act of quickscoping. First, understand that, especially in black ops, most maps didnt have but one or two, overused long range fire-lines. With that in mind, realize that there was no real advantage to sniping. I do not know of any single spot that the ak74u could not make a kill due to range. So why is it that everyone complains that the sniper rifle had a way to compensate for the lack of distance advantage.

Second, with the maps being the size they were, being the lone sniper had another disadvantage. Given most game types, FFA, TDM, HQ, and DOM, spawn exchanges occur generally within the first few minutes of the game. So soon after you hunker down for you authentic camp/snipe gameplay, you have enemy units spawn within the so-called distance equalizer. Without the ability to sight in quickly, you were easily out-gunned, and over run.

Third, and this is strictly towards black-ops, is that in the process of trying to extinguish quickscoping from the available play styles, they hindered the ability of a standard sniper, applying their sway effects and shot timer that required you to scope in for a second or two before you could take anything close to an accurate shot. This, even though seemed like a great way to end QSing, made the general principal of sniping obsolete. Its bad enough that any moving target on the board that spots you can effectively fire on you without having to move closer, but when you have to let them have their way with you for a few seconds before a confident shot could be made, it really does seem that sniping in general is what is taking the abuse.

So, I really do think everyone should get over the entire quickscoping deal, and just move on. Its bad enough that when people get stomped, that there is always an excuse as to why, ALWAYS. I've been report by numerous people, not because of anything that really deserved a report, but because people honestly couldnt accept the fact that they were beat. I think the entire quickscoping deal is that everybody wants an excuse as to why they arent the best, because if your sniping, your either a "pathetic" quick scoper, or a "camper".

And BTW, I personal do not quick scope except when its absolutely QS or die. I just want people to understand that being okay with quickscopers really comes down to whether or not you need another excuse for losing.

WHY QUICKSCOPING DOESN'T NEED TO BE IN COD.

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 19 Oct 2011 23:43:23 GMT

For anyone and everyone who says QS is only for kids, you are sooooooooooooo wrong. I am 41 years old and can QS with the best of em. However, I prefer an SMG or an Assault Rifle on small and medium maps, and a Sniper on larger maps, i.e. Wasteland, Derail, etc...I work with a guy who isn't going to purchase MW3 because QS is back. I laughed and said if you constantly get QS'd by a sniper than you aren't playing properly. Most snipers prefer certain areas of a map that have a large area they can look at. If you stayed away from those areas, your chances of being QS'd are greatly reduced. If I get QS'd 2 times in TDM, or Domination, that is a lot for me. I try to either stay away from those areas or try to flank them. QS is a part of COD that is ok with me. If you are dying many times by a sniper, then look at how you are traveling the map. The QS debate is a foolish debate that isn't going to stop IW from allowing it to be a part of their game. In my honest opinion, people that ***** about campers and QS, are just bad at the game and haven't learned from their mistakes. I'm an old dog and I learn new tricks. I love it when I go 15-2 on SND and some kid yells at me calling me a try hard. I laugh my ass off and inform them that their whiney little asses got OWNED by a 41 year old married man with 2 kids. They then shut the hell up and send me friends requests until I have to block them....lol.

WHY QUICKSCOPING DOESN'T NEED TO BE IN COD.

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:08:23 GMT

QSing will be in the game. Get over it. It's not going to change. It has WAY too big of a following behind it, just like the annoying fricken noobtube. They are both annoying, but they are BOTH staying in the game.

Get over it.

That's that.

Bury the hatchet.

Take it with a grain of salt.

Walk it off.

Stop beating a dead horse.

Let it be.

Come off it.

Drop the subject.

/discussion.

Re: WHY QUICKSCOPING DOESN'T NEED TO BE IN COD.

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:04:30 GMT

To people in this thread raging about how quickscoping requres skill and is your only way to kill people and all that: You mad bro?

All I have to say is that quickscoping is obviously an exploit as well as extremely unrealistic. But then again, so is being able to run around spraying with a sniper without ripping your shoulder clean off its joint.

WHY QUICKSCOPING DOESN'T NEED TO BE IN COD.

donotreply@activision.com — Sun, 16 Oct 2011 07:24:38 GMT

iSJx, your retort really loses any merit it could've had, because you chose to respond before thinking it through.

Multiple sources state that the SMG range has been addressed in MW3 - yet quickscoping will still be prevalent. I'm neither for or against quickscoping in this post, but any point you could've made is nullified and the only thing you're left with in your response is a jab at the guy assuming he needed to rage about dying to quickscoping. Asinine.

WHY QUICKSCOPING DOESN'T NEED TO BE IN COD.

donotreply@activision.com — Sat, 15 Oct 2011 20:06:11 GMT

Whose fault is it that you can't kill someone using a sniper at close range whilst using an automatic? SMG's shouldn't have been as effective at long range as they were in MW2 but I don't see you complaining about that. You are having a bad game, you get quickscoped and need something to blame your death on. This is a game, end of.

WHY QUICKSCOPING DOESN'T NEED TO BE IN COD.

donotreply@activision.com — Sat, 15 Oct 2011 15:21:47 GMT

If thats the case sub machine guns should not be used at long range either. Look at the ump 45 and ak74u you can shoot someone across the map with those guns in fact all sub machine guns actually.

WHY QUICKSCOPING DOESN'T NEED TO BE IN COD.

donotreply@activision.com — Sat, 15 Oct 2011 11:42:56 GMT

Quickscoping is pathetic. It's exploits like quickscoping that are ruining COD and giving it a bad reputation. It seems like IW are only listening to the 12 year olds that want quickscoping and they're ignoring the mature audience who can think properly that want quickscoping gone.

WHY QUICKSCOPING DOESN'T NEED TO BE IN COD.

donotreply@activision.com — Sat, 15 Oct 2011 11:18:38 GMT

you prolly just suck at QSing...

WHY QUICKSCOPING DOESN'T NEED TO BE IN COD.

donotreply@activision.com — Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:58:24 GMT

blame the small maps consistent with the COD series. AR's were made for ranges less than 300 yards. snipers were made for ranges 4 times that. doesnt matter a whole lot in COD because most maps are probably 400 yards square at most, and I havnt seen a FPS game that accurately limited the range of each class. (case in point that I can make cross map kills with my mini uzi in MW2- when SMG's in reality have an effective range lower than 50 yards and can make similar kills with pistols even dating back to the original PS games)

WHY QUICKSCOPING DOESN'T NEED TO BE IN COD.

donotreply@activision.com — Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:48:21 GMT

you mean like REALITY?!?!?! But a realistic game isnt supposed to include REALITY! there is a reason that the military doesnt have 'trained quickscopers' for clearing houses. snipers are made for ranges anywhere from 25 yards to a mile plus. 10 foot kills just dont work with a sniper rifle. hence why snipers carry a sidearm such as a 9mm pistol or SMG, who's effective REAL LIFE range is at most 50 yards, and yes, most modern assault rifles have an effective distance of 200 or 300 yards, which in a lot of the smaller maps of the modern warfare series, is all the way across the map. As far as that goes I have gotten hits and kills with pistols from across the map as well, but I have with most other FPS games that i have ever played, that is just something that no one has been able to accurately program into the game i guess. Untill a game is released where the actual effective ranges of each weapon class are realistically pinned down, there will be people looking to have the difficulty of using a sniper weapon for CQB running and gunning. Then players (who dont understand reality) will get PO'D because they cant hit the sniper who is hitting them because he is out of range of whatever SMG they are using.

WHY QUICKSCOPING DOESN'T NEED TO BE IN COD.

donotreply@activision.com — Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:16:03 GMT

This post didnt really have a point. Snipers anyway wouldnt go into sniper lobbies, the snipers like to go up against fully auto guns. The only reason some people get angry is because of the fact that it bothers them that they die by a sniper. They can be going 100 - 6, but if those six deaths are from snipers they will rage on and on. Just remember that the game is for EVERYONE, and not just you.