Community: Message List

Re: just got to round 101 on mob of the dead

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 23 May 2013 02:53:28 GMT

you have the coolest name ive seen on here yet

Re: What's the point to this forum...?

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 23 May 2013 02:48:32 GMT

I dont know but you would think that if 3arc were even remotely smart they would read these forums everyday. They could learn a sht load about their game if they did.

Re: Do You Want The Old Maps Back?Agree or Disagree?

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 22 May 2013 23:17:08 GMT

Yeah you can get thru gaps, but you dont slide thru them like you can on BO1 or 2. If its too close at all the zombies will cling to you like a magnet.

Re: Do You Want The Old Maps Back?Agree or Disagree?

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 22 May 2013 22:17:12 GMT

Yeah the part I think most would have trouble with is trying to run trains. On WaW, trying to spilt a gap between only 2 zombies even can be tricky. The zombies stick to you and even if the gap seem sizable its like they are most sucked into you.

Training on the actual WaW game will get you killed quick because you cant get out of half the situations you can on the WaW maps on BO1 for example, where you can seemingly just slide right past the zombies.

I remember alot of people being pssed because they thought BO1 zombies were to easy because of this.

Re: Do You Want The Old Maps Back?Agree or Disagree?

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 22 May 2013 22:06:17 GMT

Seriously? You stick to zombies like a magnet on WaW.....

Re: Do You Want The Old Maps Back?Agree or Disagree?

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 22 May 2013 21:13:21 GMT

fk yeah you get too close to a zombie it will suck you right into it. If there is two zombies your done.

Re: Do You Want The Old Maps Back?Agree or Disagree?

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 22 May 2013 20:53:39 GMT

I dont think most poeple could handle the actual WaW Zombies on the actual WW game. You cant hit small gaps on WaW like you can BO and BO2. WaW was not a good game to train on.

Re: Do You Want The Old Maps Back?Agree or Disagree?

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 22 May 2013 20:48:58 GMT

Assuming that bringing back the old maps would be a lazy move by the devs and this being your main reason for not wanting the old maps back on BO2 is the worste reason to not want the maps back imo.

For one maybe it would take more work and money to bring them back, who knows.

I would understand not wanting the maps because youve played the sht outta them and want refreshing new maps. Or even if you did want old maps out of fear you may have to pay for them again.

Re: The Shotgun Rank

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 22 May 2013 01:29:33 GMT

Rank is a touchy subject. Its supposed to be a direct representation of ones. It has some obvious glaring holes in its accuracy but with a few tweaks it seems like it could pretty accurate.

The topic of reseting rank is even more of a touchy subject. So any thread discussing this will have heated debates.

Re: Do you super mario people in grief?

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 22 May 2013 00:11:22 GMT

There is nothing quite like watching an opponent going down in Giref.

Re: The Shotgun Rank

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 22 May 2013 00:08:16 GMT

Hell yeah

Yeah its certainly best to not take things personal on any internet forum.

I dont really remember the exact details of the conversation either I just remember going what I felt was over the line and was insulting more than I was holding good coversation.

Re: The Shotgun Rank

donotreply@activision.com — Tue, 21 May 2013 23:37:14 GMT

I assumed as much lol

Whie I do have your attention tho I would like to apologize for some hardcore sht I was talking to you a week or two ago on these forums in a thread about Grief. I think I went outta line with it and would even say I was wrong about some things.

Re: The Shotgun Rank

donotreply@activision.com — Tue, 21 May 2013 23:27:40 GMT

Blake I at least have to give you credit because the first couple of posts of yours I read on this thread seemed all in good debate.

Not sure where things went wrong since then but insult vs insult isnt going to prove anyhting.

Anyway,I know what your saying by rank is no reflection of peoples stats. You see knife he could have a 40 kd with 8,000 kills and a highest round of 16. Or he could have 200,000 kills with a 200 kd and 40 round highs.

I think what Yoda meant when he said stats are accurate is that the stats that are recorded on someones account are an accurate representation of what hteyve done so far in the game. For example if their stats say they have 200,000 kills, then they have 200,000 kills.

Rank is definately not an indication of someones stats.

Re: The Shotgun Rank

donotreply@activision.com — Tue, 21 May 2013 22:55:21 GMT

I think its obvious these guys havnt even played the game. Probbaly not even to test it out through the testing phase.

And even if they have played it a time or two, tthat dont mean they really know thier own game. It seems to me alot of things they do are just random, like its a guessing game to them about what they can do that can really help the game.

Sure they may listen to us and give us some things we want but everything they do seems like they are just guessing and hoping it works out.

Re: New Wonder Weapons?

donotreply@activision.com — Tue, 21 May 2013 22:18:45 GMT

The Sliq wont help carry 3 other players like the WH will.

Sure the SLiq can take out alot of zombies if you use it right but thats about it. Its not getting you in and out of a tight spot to revive someone and then saving their arse when you see them get surrounded by 10 zombies.

Re: The Shotgun Rank

donotreply@activision.com — Tue, 21 May 2013 21:33:25 GMT

I would just like to throw this in there, the old Jimmy Z dude also said there is a way to conduct 2 or 3 player matches by using privacy settings.

He doesnt even know we cant play or 3 player games so im not listening to much he says.

This is in repsonse to SoldierTigers comment about Jimmy Z stating your rank reflects how good you are at the moment.

Re: Weirdest glitch i've ever had

donotreply@activision.com — Tue, 21 May 2013 10:49:10 GMT

I played a Solo game, probably like my 3rd game on MotD.

I went to round 31 (I think) and didnt have a Max Ammo from at least round 18 on. And only had like 5 drops period the whole 13 rounds from 18-31. It was unlike anything ive ever seen on Zombies. I made a post about it. Was it a glitch I dont know but it was wierd.

Re: New Wonder Weapons?

donotreply@activision.com — Tue, 21 May 2013 10:44:11 GMT

Well the Blunder isnt a buildable.

But say you take DT2 away from the Blunder and you could tell a big difference (like say you take DT2 way from the Python) then the Wave Gun would move up to number 3 on my list (after TG and Waff). After all, like you say, dual wielding the Wave Gun is like a (super) nerfed Waff. Put it together and its still like a nerfed Waff.

A nerfed Waff is better than any wonder weapon outside of TG and Waff so I will take it over any other WW.

So what im trying to say is my list goes

Waff

Blunder (DT2 and non acid)

Acid Gat

Wave Gun

Shrink Gun

Scavenger

Sliq

Re: New Wonder Weapons?

donotreply@activision.com — Tue, 21 May 2013 09:44:40 GMT

I would say the Blunder (Regular or Acidized) is better than the Wave Gun and Winters Howl. I thought the Wave Gun was kind of weak. I could of definately been using it wrong tho. After all Moon is probably my least favorite and least played map.

Is there any gaurentee that the Blunder or Sliq has no 115? The (regular) Blunder is so powerful it seems like it has to have 115. I would take it over any WW except the TG and Waff even without a Zombie Shield and EC. Not sure on how DT2 effects it but if weakens sginificantly like other guns without DT2 then that could change my opinion.

Re: What will be the next map

donotreply@activision.com — Tue, 21 May 2013 04:10:51 GMT

Vancouver