<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Community: Message List</title>
    <link>http://community.activision.com/index.jspa?view=discussions</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 23:05:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Jive SBS 4.5.6.3  (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-03T23:05:48Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hackers ruin this game.</title>
      <link>http://community.activision.com/message/106058907?tstart=0#106058907</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:8bac21d2-6eec-4949-9d6c-e086f8dcf7b2] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Couldn't agree more my man .. Its not about whinning . or complaining..&amp;#160; There's literally too much exploited bs in Multiplayer . Connections and migration of host .... WHY IS THIS STILL IN EFFECT ..&amp;#160; Dedicated servers is a must and activision has more than enough money for that ..&amp;#160; Exploited weapons that are&amp;#160; way overpowered and killstreaks that have know sense then being if any .&amp;#160; really hope they make some updates like treyarch did with black ops .. they really gave love to the fans and paid close attention to lag issues and exploits . &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:8bac21d2-6eec-4949-9d6c-e086f8dcf7b2] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 23:05:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>donotreply@activision.com</author>
      <guid>http://community.activision.com/message/106058907?tstart=0#106058907</guid>
      <dc:date>2011-12-03T23:05:48Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>1 year, 6 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>3</clearspace:replyCount>
      <clearspace:objectType>0</clearspace:objectType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: I'm so glad MW3 didn't have a beta. :)</title>
      <link>http://community.activision.com/message/106058903?tstart=0#106058903</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:7b6ba5e5-d907-4ab2-9a89-97726302fea0] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sarcasm is at an ALL time High . because if your telling all of us that you agree with enemies spawning behind&amp;#160; you 99 percent of the time is a good thing then your are trying way too hard to be a troll for attention ..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;the Devs slapped MW3 together including elite which was faulty the first couple of weeks after release but they sadly made 400 mill in the 1st 24hr's of release . &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For originality i tip my hate to tryarch and black ops . best killstreak was the SR71 blackbird&amp;#160; with theatre mode and wager matches and customizable emblems with endless creactive possibillties and animated titles when you got to pristege 15.&amp;#160;&amp;#160; MW3 didn't refine anything from there past cods. its another version of MW2 and some minor tweaks to IW's engine ..&amp;#160; Spec ops is a really fun success and very enjoyable with&amp;#160; friend . and thats about it .&amp;#160; Mulitplayer .&amp;#160; could have been fun if there weren't too many Exploited weapons .&amp;#160; and killstreaks that are dumber then dirt ..&amp;#160;&amp;#160; 1 more thing .... Since when was the pavelow better the the AC-130 .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:7b6ba5e5-d907-4ab2-9a89-97726302fea0] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 22:53:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>donotreply@activision.com</author>
      <guid>http://community.activision.com/message/106058903?tstart=0#106058903</guid>
      <dc:date>2011-12-03T22:53:54Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>1 year, 6 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:objectType>0</clearspace:objectType>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

